Sold Out
Book Categories |
Title: History Of The English People, Volume Iv
WonderClub
Item Number: 9781409917823
Number: 1
Product Description: Full Name: History Of The English People, Volume Iv; Short Name:History Of The English People
Universal Product Code (UPC): 9781409917823
WonderClub Stock Keeping Unit (WSKU): 9781409917823
Rating: 4/5 based on 2 Reviews
Image Location: https://wonderclub.com/images/covers/78/23/9781409917823.jpg
Weight: 0.200 kg (0.44 lbs)
Width: 0.000 cm (0.00 inches)
Heigh : 0.000 cm (0.00 inches)
Depth: 0.000 cm (0.00 inches)
Date Added: August 25, 2020, Added By: Ross
Date Last Edited: August 25, 2020, Edited By: Ross
Price | Condition | Delivery | Seller | Action |
$99.99 | Digital |
| WonderClub (9296 total ratings) |
David Moore
reviewed History Of The English People, Volume Iv on December 24, 2018Winston Churchill refers to Macaulay as a main source, along with Gibbon, that influenced the young historian-politician when he was serving in the army in India. One can see right away what Churchill means in the opening of Macaulay's incredible, epic work, with its sweeping view of British history as the rise of a parliament-limited monarchy out of the commonwealth of conquering Normans and gentry Anglo-Saxons. This takes us quickly, in the first chapter, past the Plantagenets and up to the rule of the Stuarts, who initiate modernization through their own attempts to establish absolute rule.
After more than seventy years without major civil insurrection in England proper, King Charles I dreamed of absolute rule, and in particular the ability to finance his court and his armies without need of parliament. Parliament responded by raising armies of its own. Macaulay argues that, while Parliament was bound to win eventually, having access to tax revenues while the Royals could only sell off jewels and take out loans, the King's supporters included more battle-ready nobles who held their own in the first months of the civil war. It was only later that Oliver Cromwell emerged, with his regiment of extreme Puritans, and shaped parliament's army into a disciplined force that defeated Charles I. Cromwell didn't personally wish to execute Charles I, says Macaulay, but his army of extremist anti-Catholics wished to destroy a royal family they knew to be Catholic sympathizers. The beheading of the king was thus a gap in the control of the otherwise charismatic Cromwell, who held the new military dictatorship together for a few years on the strength of his personality, and this despite the strain Puritan rule put on society:
Public amusements, from the masques which were exhibited at the mansions of the great down to the wrestling matches and grinning matches on village greens, were vigorously attacked. One ordinance directed that all the Maypoles in England should forthwith be hewn down. Another proscribed all theatrical diversions. The playhouses were to be dismantled, the spectators fined, the actors whipped at the cart's tail. Rope-dancing, puppet-shows, bowls, horse-racing, were regarded with no friendly eye. But bearbaiting, then a favourite diversion of high and low, was the abomination which most strongly stirred the wrath of the austere sectaries. It is to be remarked that their antipathy to this sport had nothing in common with the feeling which has, in our own time, induced the legislature to interfere for the purpose of protecting beasts against the wanton cruelty of men. The Puritan hated bearbaiting, not because it gave pain to the bear, but because it gave pleasure to the spectators. Indeed, he generally contrived to enjoy the double pleasure of tormenting both spectators and bear. (Chapter 2)
Christmas celebrations were also banned, with people told to fast instead, to much grumbling and flouting of the laws. Macaulay argues that England's single brief flirtation with military dictatorship served to bring together all the feuding factions of gentry and aristocracy, and the larger public opinion, towards the old English constitution, namely the free election of a Parliament empowered to hold taxes, and the grand tradition of the royal family holding military authority, within reason. After the Restoration, both Charles II and James II would dream as their father had done, of absolute rule, and even seek support from Louis XIV of France, despite the wiser notion of early "diplomatists" that it would be better make alliances with rising Holland and Sweden to contain the expansionary French. The drama of France, the Stuarts and imperfect statesman like Lord Danby (Thomas Osborne, 1632-1712) and the Marquess of Halifax (George Savile, 1633-1695) form the political context for the Anglo-Dutch War and the Glorious Revolution to come. An attempt to overthrow Charles II, the Rye House plot, was botched in its early stages, but involves one Titus Oates, a "perjurer" who traded in conspiracy theories against Catholics.
Chapter Three is by far the most interesting of the book, as the whirlwind of politics is left aside for a minute overview of Britain in the the 17th century, and how different it was from the 19th century Macaulay knew. There were wild woods, then, and moors, that supported a floating population of commoners. The north, around York, was very primitive before the days of coal. The country’s tradition of responsible economic management was just beginning, and only a few, like Danby and North, understood the nuances of world trade, and debt and taxes. The land was unfair, and taxes on the poor more punishing than we can imagine tolerating today.
The militia was the only army of England, in those wary years after Cromwell, but Charles II quietly saved and built a new standing army, which would be the foundation of the modern British army. A professional navy grew, in fits and starts, with gentleman and seamen, but at first lacking training centers. Total expenditures on the military were much lower then than today. Diplomacy similarly received only the barest little investment in those days, which was a symptom of the general situation in which public funds supported lavish wealth where they ought to have been spent on the public good. Agricultural economy was primitive in those days, with poor breeds of wheat and cattle and horse, and unhealthy salt. Finer products came from abroad, or were exported. Country gentlemen at this time combined crude ignorance and low speech with true aristocratic feeling; it was they who fought for Charles when cosmopolitan minds had left him. Country priests were impoverished, much in decline since the days of Wolsey, leaving them little time to study, and so they remained ignorant and intolerant to latitudinarian tendencies of urban prelates. Beyond London, the largest port and county towns, Norwich and Bristol, were puny and provincial compared to today, with populations scarcely 30,000. Many new towns like Manchester would be significant soon after. County towns were the centers of culture and pleasure for the county squires who rarely went to London.
London was the capital, where men formed opinions with each other in coffeehouses, and aristocrats like the Duke of Monmouth kept great mansions and gardens. It was also dark, dirty, and filled with many piles of trash, with poor roads that flooded and trapped carts and pedestrians. And thieves and rapists plied at night along unlit roads. Conveyance was inconvenient, with bad politics leaving bad roads. Highwaymen lurked on all routes wealth was known to travel; they had a romantic public image, particularly among the poor and women, who found them sexy.
Gradually, the country was pulling itself out of a dark age. The postal service made its appearance, improving communication. Pubs were popular resting stops and nodes for news and public opinion throughout the country, with good food and warm congeniality. The London Gazette began as a simple newsletter delivered to a few places, like Cambridge. Press censorship was general at this time, and few books or media turned a profit. One exception was drama, which exhibited the general state of moral turpitude, a direct reaction against the extremism and hypocrisy of Puritanism. It was not a great age for literature, nor for art and architecture, Christopher Wren's example notwithstanding. Physics rose up and began to develop in Britain as in other parts of Europe, a remarkable fact given the social obstructions to intellectual life; the life and achievements of Isaac Newton are the most remarkable of all, as he combines abstract and practical genius as no one else has since. (In a liberal society, we must strive to create a world where the Newtons can survive plague and poverty and gain the resources they need to develop their talents.) The vast masses of Britain earned very little, and suffered the abuses of high taxation, and child labor, as well as the other low conditions, like difficult transport. Prisons were hell. There are always some, Macaulay muses, who imagine the past to be one of greater humanity, and the modern age is degraded. But a more accurate proposition might be to say that our impression of progress made is great enough to alert us to our own imperfect conditions, but unhistorical enough to lead us to look to the past for solutions to our problems. Our discontent should drive us forward.
Chapter Four marks a return to the political story of the ascension of James II and its repercussions. Macaulay offers a detailed account of Charles II's unexpected death in 1685, and especially how he converted to Catholicism in a last minute victory of personal conviction over political expedience. Rumors abounded soon after that Charles had been poisoned.
James II was very different from his brother in personality, though not so much in fundamental values. Halifax and others were demoted as James established his own favorites into positions of power. We learn about Sir George Jeffreys, Chief Justice of the Court of King's Bench, famous for his cruelty in enforcing the King's wrath on his enemies:
He was a man of quick and vigorous parts, but constitutionally prone to insolence and to the angry passions. When just emerging from boyhood he had risen into practice at the Old Bailey bar, a bar where advocates have always used a license of tongue unknown in Westminster Hall. Here, during many years his chief business was to examine and crossexamine the most hardened miscreants of a great capital. Daily conflicts with prostitutes and thieves called out and exercised his powers so effectually that he became the most consummate bully ever known in his profession. Tenderness for others and respect for himself were feelings alike unknown to him. He acquired a boundless command of the rhetoric in which the vulgar express hatred and contempt. The profusion of maledictions and vituperative epithets which composed his vocabulary could hardly have been rivalled in the fishmarket or the beargarden. His countenance and his voice must always have been unamiable. But these natural advantages,—for such he seems to have thought them,—he had improved to such a degree that there were few who, in his paroxysms of rage, could see or hear him without emotion. Impudence and ferocity sate upon his brow. The glare of his eyes had a fascination for the unhappy victim on whom they were fixed. Yet his brow and his eye were less terrible than the savage lines of his mouth. His yell of fury, as was said by one who had often heard it, sounded like the thunder of the judgment day.
Many would die after facing Jeffreys' bench. Meanwhile, James II is scrupulous in calling parliamentary elections to take in taxes, despite his own sense that he need to toady to Louis XIV. Fortunes were made and lost as power and resources were given up and re-consolidated. Take John Churchill as a case in point, the older brother of James' mistress:
...a fine youth, who carried a pair of colours in the foot guards. He rose fast in the court and in the army, and was early distinguished as a man of fashion and of pleasure. His stature was commanding, his face handsome, his address singularly winning, yet of such dignity that the most impertinent fops never ventured to take any liberty with him; his temper, even in the most vexatious and irritating circumstances, always under perfect command. His education had been so much neglected that he could not spell the most common words of his own language: but his acute and vigorous understanding amply supplied the place of book learning. He was not talkative: but when he was forced to speak in public, his natural eloquence moved the envy of practiced rhetoricians. 239 His courage was singularly cool and imperturbable. During many years of anxiety and peril, he never, in any emergency, lost even for a moment, the perfect use of his admirable judgment.
In his twenty-third year he was sent with his regiment to join the French forces, then engaged in operations against Holland. His serene intrepidity distinguished him among thousands of brave soldiers. His professional skill commanded the respect of veteran officers. He was publicly thanked at the head of the army, and received many marks of esteem and confidence from Turenne, who was then at the height of military glory.
Unhappily the splendid qualities of John Churchill were mingled with alloy of the most sordid kind. Some propensities, which in youth are singularly ungraceful, began very early to show themselves in him. He was thrifty in his very vices, and levied ample contributions on ladies enriched by the spoils of more liberal lovers. He was, during a short time, the object of the violent but fickle fondness of the Duchess of Cleveland. On one occasion he was caught with her by the King, and was forced to leap out of the window. She rewarded this hazardous feat of gallantry with a present of five thousand pounds. With this sum the prudent young hero instantly bought an annuity of five hundred a year, well secured on landed property. 240 Already his private drawer contained a hoard of broad pieces which, fifty years later, when he was a Duke, a Prince of the Empire, and the richest subject in Europe, remained untouched.
Macaulay makes the point that the striving against one another advanced the transformation of British political form, which was just then at an unhappy midpoint between absolute rule of the king and government by parliament. But civil procedures and social and political institutions were on developing in those years. Tolerance for Catholics was on the rise, as well, for though ecclesiastical disputes simmered, contrary parties came to truce in the face of John's Catholicism, and Pope Innocent IX, feeling his way towards conflict with Louis XIV, looked for ways to re-approach Britain.
The Tory party was at the height of its power, to the disadvantage of the Whigs, who were suspected of killing Charles as part of their effort to remove the Stuarts. Whigs not only lost the general election of 1685, but faced massive discrimination from their peers at all levels of British society. James II, who had been for religious freedom during his years of exile, tended to oppress Calvinists and Presbyterian groups, especially in Scotland, which had fewer legal and political controls against torture, and many martyrs are still remembered. The Quakers largely escaped political notice, being that they mostly avoided political discourse, with the notable exception of WIlliam Penn, one of James' most important courtiers, and a man whose thoughts on political form would come to fruition in the colonies.
King and Parliament agreed on policies for religious exclusion, like the Test Act, but disagreed on the details. This and the right to Habeus Corpus were the subject of the main debates on the rights of citizens. Tory supporters of the king rose to majorities after the election, handing the king new taxes, designed partly by the early economist Dudley North.
Rebellion is the theme of the final chapter of volume one, Chapter Five. The Duke of Monmouth, Charles II's estranged son in Holland, partied like a dandy while his father was alive, but despaired when his cruel and jealous uncle came to power, making him vulnerable, Macaulay says, to the demands for rebellion put out by other British exiles active in Holland, especially one Robert Ferguson:
Ferguson was by birth a Scot; but England had long been his residence. At the time of the Restoration, indeed, he had held a living in Kent. He had been bred a Presbyterian; but the Presbyterians had cast him out, and he had become an Independent. He had been master of an academy which the Dissenters had set up at Islington as a rival to Westminster School and the Charter House; and he had preached to large congregations at a meeting house in Moorfields. He had also published some theological treatises which may still be found in the dusty recesses of a few old libraries; but, though texts of Scripture were always on his lips, those who had pecuniary transactions with him soon found him to be a mere swindler.
At length he turned his attention almost entirely from theology to the worst part of politics. He belonged to the class whose office it is to render in troubled times to exasperated parties those services from which honest men shrink in disgust and prudent men in fear, the class of fanatical knaves. Violent, malignant, regardless of truth, insensible to shame, insatiable of notoriety, delighting in intrigue, in tumult, in mischief for its own sake, he toiled during many years in the darkest mines of faction. He lived among libellers and false witnesses. He was the keeper of a secret purse from which agents too vile to be acknowledged received hire, and the director of a secret press whence pamphlets, bearing no name, were daily issued. He boasted that he had contrived to scatter lampoons about the terrace of Windsor, and even to lay them under the royal pillow. In this way of life he was put to many shifts, was forced to assume many names, and at one time had four different lodgings in different corners of London. He was deeply engaged in the Rye House plot.
Ferguson convinced Monmouth to head a resistance party, including an army that would be commanded, though only in commonwealth by committee, by Lord Argyle, a Presbyterian aristocrat of Scotland who was no fan of James II. Argyle should have demanded unity of command under him. Monmouth was brave, but had a "soft mind," no good for the details of such an undertaking. In painstaking detail, we witness how the rebellion failed. Forces were mounted to leave from Amsterdam, a republican city that flouted its supposed oversight from the States General or Prince William, the Stadtholder, who were supposed to help James by stopping Monmouth. Once in Britain, though, clumsy and ineffective troop movements ensured failure for Argyle in Scotland, and Monmouth, later, from the south. Interestingly, both Argyle and Monmouth had been supported by rich women in Holland. Scottish rebellion was hurt by disunity among Scottish Presbyterians, Argyle being a Campbell, hated by other Scottish families. Monmouth found great support in the town of Taunton, but only among the virulent anti-Catholic townspeople, and not the nobility and gentry, who weren't persuaded Monmouth wouldn't change the political situation too much for them to hold power and wealth. Ferguson and Monmouth were unable to score wins that they needed, and anti-Puritan sentiment in and out of London was too strong still to move the larger population. Monmouth made a final stand at a place called Sedgemore, in a battle that Macaulay narrates with pleasing levels of excitement. Unlike his father or grandfather, Monmouth did not die with dignity, but begged for his life from James II. In the wake of the failed rebellion, James and Jeffreys put many to death, in what was a low moment of British legal history. The reputation of the Puritans and the Whigs was as low as ever. But surprising change was just around the corner. I was surprised to find that Macaulay does not sum up the volume as he did the first chapter, but I suppose he meant to leave us primed for the volume to follow, in which the Glorious Revolution must take center stage.
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your CollectionHistory Of The English People, Volume Iv
X
This Item is in Your InventoryHistory Of The English People, Volume Iv
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
Add History Of The English People, Volume Iv, , History Of The English People, Volume Iv to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add History Of The English People, Volume Iv, , History Of The English People, Volume Iv to your collection on WonderClub |