Reviews for Well-posedness of parabolic difference equations

The average rating for Well-posedness of parabolic difference equations based on 2 reviews is 4 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2019-03-31 00:00:00 Nick Mutascio After reading the collection in 'Mother West Wind "Where" Stories', I figured the next collection read couldn't continue the same over used template in the last set. i was wrong. This book is much the same. Basically the same story over and over. Apparently Burgess had no ability to flesh out plots from any other angle. This collection is a wee better with a few stories having a bit more to them, but the concept is the same. Adding to that is the title of the book. Two books in and I still not read one word about a "Mother West Wind". Also this one has "How" in the title as the last has "Where". Yet, the first book has nothing to do with "Where" and the "How" is questionable here. I also don't care for the fantasy of this "Mother Nature" altering creatures as a plot device. The writing is OK, beyond the repetitious wording. Bottom line: I don't recommend this book. 5 out of ten.

Review # 2 was written on 2019-02-09 00:00:00 Kathryn Roche Thornton W. Burgess' little nature stories are as delightful in adulthood as in childhood, which is, as C. S. Lewis said, proof of a good children's book. I hadn't visited The Green Meadows, the Green Forest, the Briar Patch, or the Smiling Pool in decades, but what fun to return and find Peter Rabbit, Grandfather Frog (the wise old storyteller), Billy Mink, King Bear, Mr. Weasel, Mr. Owl, Reddy the Squirrel, and all the other happy people (for people they are) who live and play and learn in the wonderful world Mr. Burgess constructed from the places of his childhood. These would be wonderful stories to read to a grandchild (the dachshunds don't seem much interested), if I had a grandchild. After all, a child cannot grow aware of his or her heritage and the joys of nature through the dreary, spec-written nonsense commissioned by state agencies.