Reviews for Symposium

The average rating for Symposium based on 2 reviews is 5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2008-07-03 00:00:00 Lisa Southard Συμπόσιον = Symposium, Plato The Symposium is a philosophical text by Plato dated c. 385-370 BC. It depicts a friendly contest of extemporaneous speeches given by a group of notable men attending a banquet. The men include the philosopher Socrates, the general and political figure Alcibiades, and the comic playwright Aristophanes. عنوانها: «ضیافت»؛ «سخن در خصوص عشق»؛ اثر: افلاطون؛ تاریخ نخستین خوانش: ماه سپتامبر سال 1984میلادی عنوان: ضیافت، یا، سخن در خصوص عشق؛ اثر: افلاطون؛ ترجمه و پیشگفتار: محمدعلی فروغی؛ ویراستار و پی نوشت محمدابراهیم امینی فرد؛ مشخصات نشر تهران، جامی، 1385، در 160ص، از سری افلاطون، شابک 9642575000؛ کتاب با عنوان «ضیافت، درس عشق از زبان افلاطون» با ترجمه «محمود صناعی» توسط انتشارات جامی در سال 1381هجری خورشیدی نیز منتشر شده است، چاپ دوم 1386، چاپ سوم 1389؛ موضوع عشق، سقراط (از سال 469پیش از میلادی تا سال 399 پیش از میلاد) - فلسفه یونان پس زمین و عشق بودند، که جانشین هرج و مرج و بی شکلی آغازین هستی شدند؛ این رساله از رساله‌ های سقراطی «افلاطون» است، که در آنها «سقراط»، چهره ی نخست رویداد بوده است، روایتی‌ است، که در بخشی از آن خوانشگر، شاهد گفتگوی بازیگران، با یکدیگر است؛ نام این داستان نیز، اشاره به مهمانی‌هایی دارد، که در «یونان باستان» برگزار می‌شد، و مهمانان پس از خوردن خوراک، به نوشیدن باده، و گفتگو و بحث، پیرامون موضوعی مشخص، می‌پرداختند؛ تاریخ نگارش این رساله به درستی آشکار نیست، ولی از نشانه ها برمی‌آید، که پس از سال 385پیش از میلاد، نوشته‌ شده باشد؛ تاریخ بهنگام رسانی 17/07/1399هجری خورشیدی؛ ا. شربیانی

Review # 2 was written on 2018-03-25 00:00:00 Sandra G. Goeden Plato's Symposium is one of the most loved classics from the ancient world, a work of consummate beauty as both philosophy and as literature, most appropriate since the topic of this dialogue is the nature of love and includes much philosophizing on beauty. In the spirit of freshness, I will focus on one very important section, where Socrates relates the words of his teacher Diotima on the birth of Love explained in the context of myth: "Following the birth of Aphrodite, the other gods were having a feast, including Resource, the son of Invention. When they'd had dinner, Poverty came to beg, as people do at feasts, and so she was by the gate. Resource was drunk with nectar (this was before wine was discovered), went into the garden of Zeus, and fell into drunken sleep. Poverty formed the plan of relieving her lack of resources by having a child by Resource; she slept with him and became pregnant with Love. So the reason Love became a follower and attendant of Aphrodite is because he was conceived on the day of her birth; also he is naturally a lover of beauty and Aphrodite is beautiful." Diotima continues but let's pause here as according to many teachers within the Platonic tradition there are at least two critical points to be made about this passage. The first is how love is conceived in the garden of Zeus, and that's Zeus as mythical personification of Nous or true intellectual understanding. In other words, for one seeking philosophic wisdom, love is born and exists within the framework of truth and understanding, thus, in order to have a more complete appreciation of the nature of love, one must be committed to understanding the nature of truth. The second point is how within the Platonic tradition, truth is linked with beauty. Two of my own Plato teachers were adamant on this point, citing how modern people who separate beauty from truth can never partake of the wisdom traditions. (Incidentally, these exact two points are made eloquently by Pierre Grimes in this video: ). Although I am not a strict Platonist, I tend to agree. When I encounter people who have sharp minds and are keenly analytical but communicate their ideas in snide or sarcastic unbeautiful language or are in any way disingenuous or degrading of others, I find such behavior very much in bad taste. In a very real sense, I feel these individuals have cut themselves off from the world's wisdom traditions, particularly from the Platonic tradition. I wanted to focus on this one paragraph to convey a sense of the richness of this magnificent Platonic dialogue. One could mine wisdom nuggets from each and every paragraph. And, yes, I get a kick every time I read the speech of Aristophanes featuring those cartwheeling prehumans with four arms and four legs. Also, two fun facts: One: reflecting on Alcibiades, the history of philosophy records another incredibly handsome man with a similar great head of curly hair and full curly beard, a man (fortunately!) with a much stronger character - the Stoic philosopher and Roman Emperor, Marcus Aurelius. Two: Diogenes Laertius reports the Greek philosopher Epicurus also wrote a book with the title Symposium. Unfortunately, this piece of writing is lost to us. Darn!