Reviews for The Loving Dead

The average rating for The Loving Dead based on 2 reviews is 2.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2010-05-21 00:00:00 Christopher Destefano If you'd told me before reading this book that I wouldn't like a book about zombies that included graphic girl on girl sex scenes and was endorsed by one of my favorite authors, Christopher Moore, I'd have said you were crazy, but this book just flat out wasn't good. The pre-billing said this book was a lovechild of C-Moore and Chuck Palahniuk. It failed to say the kid was born with flippers instead of hands.

Review # 2 was written on 2012-10-21 00:00:00 James Keefe Really 2.5 stars Zombie erotica is its own special kind of erotica, and this is not the first of its kind that I have read. Zombie erotica basically consists of….zombies and erotica. Also punny titles. The title is definitely the best part of this book. Everyone I said it to when they asked what I was reading totally cracked up. The basic concept is rather ordinary, and the execution, while it has a few laughs, is mostly ho-hum. Making the zombie plague an STD is a logical leap. Many illnesses spread sexually, and often they spread before there are any visible symptoms. In fact it's a great way to spread an illness because of the amount of *ahem* proximity between career and the previously healthy person combined with the fact that people almost always will be having sex. Toss in that the virus amps up attractiveness and/or promiscuity, and you've really got an epidemic. The problem, of course, is that at some point the carriers have to actually turn into zombies. Beamer handles this transition moderately well. It is eventually understood that the carriers are basically irresistible crack-cocaine to the nearby uninfected, so that even if they know this person is about to turn into a zombie, they will still hook up with them. It's unfortunate that such a creative zombie plague is wrapped in a mostly ho-hum storyline that only becomes interesting when it becomes borderline offensive. For the most part the story features two of the roommates in a household of 20-somethings approaching the zombie apocalypse getting separated early on, approaching the zombie apocalypse in their own way, then working to get reunited. Michael tries to pull the household together when Kate abandons ship pretending that nothing is happening to keep her "date" with an older man that is actually more of a sugar daddy appointment. Michael's storyline is fairly straight-forward and believable, whereas Kate's quickly goes off the rails. I also am not sure that I'm a fan of the whole writing her as a huge slut who winds up having to pay for her crimes whereas Michael is the golden guy thing. I don't think Beamer intended it be read that way, but it certainly does not come across as sex positive. The other part of the storyline that bothered me is that there is a rape. Now. I am not against rape as part of the plot in anything but erotica. It is a crime that happens and pretending like it doesn't happen is bizarre. But rape in erotica is an entirely different ballgame. Erotica is all about turning on the reader, and I do not condone using a very real rape to turn a reader on. Clearly two consenting adults can agree to act out a scene of non-consent if they wish, but within the book, this is not a consenting scene of non-consent. There is no prior discussion, no safeword. The character is definitely raped. To me it is no different from tossing in a pedophilia scene. It is an awful, heinous crime, and it shouldn't be running around turning people on. When a book's entire point is to turn people on, it should definitely not be all up in my erotica. All of that said, I must still admit that the book is well-written. It is engaging with a unique plot. I truly feel it is a book that each reader must decide upon for themselves, but I do hope that readers will come into it better informed than I was, knowing about the questionable sex positivity and the rape content. Check out my full review.