Reviews for Biped: Business in Process Enterprise Design

The average rating for Biped: Business in Process Enterprise Design based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2011-05-06 00:00:00 Joseph Rhoe It states that all bodily activity is caused controlled and directed by the mind. Suggesting that the two are separate entities, and that one controls the other. Though it could be just as easily argued that the body controls the mind. The nerves running through the body send messages both ways. If you put your hand on a hot surface it sends a message to the mind to let it know. A simple example of the body directing the mind to move. It can be argued in either direction. One would not exist without the other. There is enough evidence to support the fact they aren’t separate entities at all, but one and the same. If you think of the body like a computer, it is true that the graphics card and the monitor are separate pieces, but one wouldn’t be much without the other. In the same way the mind and the body are two parts of the same thing. This also leads into a flawed statement that good health isn’t necessary to achievement. A lack of calcium or iron in the body could be detrimental to the mind and could throw one’s thyroid out of whack making it impossible for them to focus, move, or even do regular day to day chores. It is true you can still make achievements with poor health, but the energy and effort that must be put forth to accomplish your objectives are far easier and much more probable when in good health. It is also stated that the brain isn’t part of the mind but another organ. This only leads me to believe that they are thinking of the mind as the plasma (an element with free roaming electrons, not blood) charging through our nerves sending signals to our brain and helping us to function. This could be represented by the electricity that makes a computer work. But as before, one wouldn’t be much without the other. With my mind caught on these flaws, it tainted the rest of the structures for thought given. A good scientist doesn’t set forth to prove themselves right, but often will attempt to prove themselves wrong, in means to find truth. While this book is well organized and attempts to use the scientific method, there are too many flaws and holes in its base logic to support it as a whole. If the flaws can be pinpointed and ignored there are still good lessons in this book. It’s well organized, and the methods are put forth in ways easy to understand. It does follow one form of logic and explains itself well. Overall, I liked it more than I disliked the flaws. I recommend it to anyone who likes to read books on psychology.

Review # 2 was written on 2015-10-09 00:00:00 Parker Swanson Free from guttenberg.org