Wonder Club world wonders pyramid logo
×

Reviews for The Hidden Men

 The Hidden Men magazine reviews

The average rating for The Hidden Men based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.has a rating of 3 stars

Review # 1 was written on 2013-07-13 00:00:00
1999was given a rating of 3 stars Michelle Pratt
I have read this play many times, and--although Shakespeare always shows me something new--this reading gave me little insight and few surprises. I was struck with two parallels, however--one within the play itself, and one within Shakespeare's body of work. First of all, I appreciated the subtle parallels between the Hotspur-Glendower and the Hal-Falstaff scenes. Each young man spends much of his time needling a self-important, older man who is such a windbag that the audience is almost automatically on the young man's side. Hotspur, whom we are inclined to respect because of his high spirits and his achievements as a warrior, is so easily irritated, and carries his own self-regard so close to the surface, that his needling of Glendower--although deserved--seem pointless, rash and injudicious. (It may, in fact, prove fatal, since Glendower fails to come to Hotspur's aid when most needed--a dereliction perhaps precipitated by the younger man's abrasive heckling.) Consequently, although we like Hotspur at the end of the scene as much as we liked him at the beginning, we respect him a good deal less. Contrast with this the Hal-Falstaff exchanges. Hal, already characterized as a wastrel, punctures Falstaff's pomposity with such a controlled attack of pointed wit that we begin to admire him for his discipline (at least in conversation), and sense that there may be more to him than appears on the surface. In addition, Falstaff--unlike the humorless Glendower--is a worthy opponent, filled with wit and self-awareness, and the fact that Hal can more than hold his own--and keep his temper too--suggests a self-awareness, a deliberately cultivated distance from his degraded surroundings, that prepares us for his eventual transformation just as much as his soliloquy about the sun. The other parallel--between plays--is closer, but certainly less important. Lady Percy, in her attempts to gain information about the coming rebellion, delivers a speech that is very much like Portia's speech to Brutus in similar circumstances. Their conduct afterwards, though, is different. Portia--the stoic Roman--cuts herself in the thigh to prove her ability to keep a secret, but Lady Percy--a hardy warrior's bride--tries to break her husband's little finger and force him to talk. (Like I said, this isn't that important, but it is interesting how a great dramatist can use similar materials in support of very different effects.) Speaking overall, I am once again astonished by the great command of voices that Shakespeare demonstrates in this play. Hotspur, Falstaff, Glendower, Hal and Mistress Quickly all use language in very distinctive ways, and even the casual conversation of the servants in the stable yard is vivid and characteristic. I am also impressed with the expert and seamless blending of poetry with prose, history with comedy, rhetoric with wit. By the time he wrote Henry IV, Shakespeare could not only do it all, but he knew exactly how--and when--to mix it up. This is indisputably the work of a master.
Review # 2 was written on 2017-04-18 00:00:00
1999was given a rating of 3 stars Wallace Chin
King Henry IV, Part 1 (Wars of the Roses, #2), William Shakespeare King Henry IV, Part 1 is a history play, by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written no later than 1597. It is the second play in Shakespeare's tetralogy dealing with the successive reigns of Richard II, Henry IV (two plays, including Henry IV, Part 2), and Henry V. King Henry IV, Part 1 depicts a span of history that begins with Hotspur's battle at Homildon in Northumberland against Douglas late in 1402 and ends with the defeat of the rebels at Shrewsbury in the middle of 1403. From the start it has been an extremely popular play both with the public and critics. تاریخ نخستین خوانش روز دهم ماه ژانویه سال 1989میلادی عنوان: نخستین بخش شاه هنری چهارم؛ عنوان قراردادی هنری چهام - بخش نخست؛ نویسنده ویلیام شکسپیر؛ مترجم احمد خزاعی؛ تهران، اکباتان، 1367، در 242ص، عکس، عنوان روی جلد هنری چهارم؛ موضوع هنری چهارم شاه انگلستان (از سال 1367میلادی تا سال 1413میلادی) - سده 16م هنری چهارم سومین نمایشنامه از یک مجموعه چهار نمایشنامه ای است که شکسپیر در آنها دوران حکومت ریچارد دوم، هنری چهارم، و هنری پنجم، سه تن از پادشاهان انگلستان را بازگو مینمایند؛ ا. شربیانی


Click here to write your own review.


Login

  |  

Complaints

  |  

Blog

  |  

Games

  |  

Digital Media

  |  

Souls

  |  

Obituary

  |  

Contact Us

  |  

FAQ

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!!