Reviews for The Historical Development of Fundamental Moral Theology in the United States: Readings in Moral Theology

The average rating for The Historical Development of Fundamental Moral Theology in the United States: Readings in Moral Theology based on 2 reviews is 2.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2010-06-18 00:00:00 KEIJI YAMASHITA Badly researched and compiled and painfully subjective. For all the emphasis on empiricism, there was a remarkable lack of it in this book.

Review # 2 was written on 2019-05-07 00:00:00 Jacob Conrad An interesting look at demonic possession in modern Italy. The book gives a brief history of demonic possession in the New Testament and in Roman Catholic tradition. The author goes on to spotlight several exorcists and some of the people they have tried to help. She also talks about Satanic cults in Italy and some grisly murders. She wraps up the book with insights from psychologists and skeptics. The only thing I didn't care for is the author's obvious skepticism and her ignorance of the philosophy of science. Here's a representative remark from the author: "Religion is not logical. It is based on faith, not reason." Yes, religion is certainly based on faith. However, I would disagree that "religion is not logical." Most, if not all, religions have at least some internal logic. No religion is completely logical. Nor, I might add, is any system of human thought. And, apparently unknown to the author, scientists are often exercising a lot of faith in their theories and models. She also seems to be somewhat ignorant of modern trends. For instance, she seems skeptical when priests tell her that witchcraft and occult practices are on the rise. The author really needs to get out more. Most chain bookstores have an entire section on neo-paganism, wicca, witchcraft, and the occult (including how to practice). One can logically deduce that there is an increasing interest in these things. An interesting book. Good, but not great.