Reviews for Why we evaluate

The average rating for Why we evaluate based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2019-08-03 00:00:00 Robert Huckleberry A hypnotic, lyric, ethically dubious case study of 3 paranoid schizophrenics who all think they're Christ. Rokeach, a psychologist who had the Three Christs come together in a mental hospital in the early '60s, is a gifted writer of character, and raises fascinating questions of identity and belief. The book is carried, though, by two of the 3 Christs, figures that few novelists would have been able to concoct. Joseph Cassell, a manic letter writer, and Leon Gabor, whose identity constantly shifts, provide much of the textual interest here. I couldn't put it down, after i got past the relatively dry beginning, and found myself rooting for these men, knowing full well that the odds of their being "healed" were slim-to-none. The action is, as you might expect, sometimes disturbing. Most of all, though, there are moments of staggering, sharp beauty (the three slowly begin eating meals together, they sing in their group sessions, they vote for things) that speak to the inherent social goodness of the human being.

Review # 2 was written on 2017-02-12 00:00:00 Jacob Coleman Three schizophrenics—Clyde, Joseph, and Leon—are brought together in a Michigan state mental institution in 1959 (before the onset of the devastating 'deinstitutionalization' that Rick Moody laments in his introduction). Each one believes he is God, in some manifestation: either originary or reincarnated. Not a god among gods, but the one true authoritative God of the Judeo-Christian tradition, albeit with the baroque and often unintelligible embellishments of the psychotic mind. Clinical psychologist Milton Rokeach and his assistants undertake a unique speculative 'treatment'—to bring these mutually incompatible identities into conflict with one another in carefully controlled meetings and pointed discussions. The hope is that the tension yielded from these encounters will inspire some (admittedly crude and only preliminary) insight into these patients' own delusions. Of course, the project is ultimately a failure in the rigorous sense. (This is not exactly a spoiler—since over fifty years later schizophrenia is still very much with us.) But The Three Christs of Ypsilanti remains relevant and important to this day not necessarily with respect to its stated clinical purpose, but rather in the many questions and related concerns that it raises along the way. What consititutes human identity? Why does identity appear to have reached a crisis state in modern times? How does a psychologist successfully manage the problematic ethics of provoking a schizophrenic in the attempt to improve his condition? Do psychotics truly believe in their delusions to the same extent that non-psychotics believe in the world around them? How can psychological treatment ever hope to 'reach' a schizophrenic when, by definition, he is suspicious of reality and rejects all real-world authorities? The questions are numerous, the answers are few and far between, but the process is thought-provoking. Leon, the youngest of the schizophrenics, is particularly captivating; unlike the other two Christs, his psychosis hasn't advanced to a stage where he completely neglects rational considerations. He still attempts to arrange his delusions in an internally-consistent fashion and often displays remarkable insight into what Rokeach and his assistants are trying to do to the three Christs. As such, he is the only one of three who undergoes profound changes during the experiment—although these changes don't necessarily point to a perceivable improvement in his condition. Yes, the riddle of schizophrenia continues...