Reviews for Revolt, Affect, Collectivity: The Unstable Boundaries of Kristeva's Polis

The average rating for Revolt, Affect, Collectivity: The Unstable Boundaries of Kristeva's Polis based on 2 reviews is 4 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2014-06-07 00:00:00 Joan Rubik I really hated this book. It was a form of criminological torture. The man does not make metaphors about crime relating to nature. He claims that crime is a sentient being and thus should be analyzed as any other creature in nature. His theoretical framework rests entirely in routine activity theory and thus avoids any discussion of irrelevant matters such as the offender, the victim, or societal issues that may have influenced things like 'motive'. In RAT the focus is on the convergence of offender, target, and the lack of a guardian. While Felson has many interesting concepts within the book, he frequently starts a new idea only to stop midway through the explanation and change the subject which leaves the reader feeling frustrated. He may have had valid reasons for not wAnting to expand upon many of his ideas (such as the need to avoid stepping on toes in another researcher's work) but this leaves his own work incomplete. I felt like the parts of his work that weren't sheer common sense thinking (especially for one versed in the discipline), were simply incomplete. I would not recommend this book to any but graduate students with a firm dedication to study environmental criminology or routine activity theory. And even those academics should be forewarned that at points, the man sounds like a raving lunatic.

Review # 2 was written on 2016-04-19 00:00:00 Trent I uncle