Reviews for Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America

The average rating for Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America based on 2 reviews is 1 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2009-01-29 00:00:00 Brooke James The only people who read Coulter are Extremists; she fuels their political conviction. There is nothing moderate about Guilty. It doesn't persuade, argue or take stance. It is a blatant venomous rant against the Left. It is too obvious to be humorous, too predictable to be exciting. Her research department is a handful of college conservatives running Lexis-Nexis searches for articles she can assault. Her proof of Liberal media bias consists of out of context quotes from obscure politicians and anorexic young starlets. I can forgive her rabid shtick; she's just making a living working a niche. I can't forgive her complete lack of wit and talent. Guilty is an unbook. It is a collection of quotes and acidic refutations that could be rearranged randomly without anyone noticing.

Review # 2 was written on 2011-04-07 00:00:00 Rosa Lopez Less a book than a piece of carefully calibrated propaganda for Ms. Coulter's tweets, GUILTY will find exactly the audience it is intended to, and speaks directly to their prejudices and anxieties, like all good fascism does. So you can expect middle class values ensrhined as a kind of self-congratulatory gospel of intolerance. No sense of global politics, no sense of history, and no real grasp of the imaginary statistics that might back up her (un)shocking assertions about the evils of social responsibility, free thought, and political context. If Coulter's ideas were more original or her wit sharper I would admire her. I cannot even dislike her as a cardboard pundit, because she is a blonde face on a bland machine. As it is I think she is a very lucky lady milking her moment for every shekel she can squeeze out of the moron majority. Lots of idiots to harvest, so her scythe will stay busy...