Reviews for Romanticism And Postromanticism

The average rating for Romanticism And Postromanticism based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2011-02-10 00:00:00 Melissa Derosa Stendhal is the author of my favorite novel, The Red and the Black, and in the late 1990s I began work on a PhD dissertation examining the interconnection between nineteenth-century realism and postmodern theory. In some ways, Ann Jefferson's Reading Realism in Stendhal changed not only my critical perspective, but my whole life. You see, to that point, I had read Stendhal through the conventional eyes of the novel's translator (at the time, the older version by Margaret Shaw) in a way that painted him as a dull, tiresome realist. Reading Realism in Stendhal taught me to be skeptical of such conventions in order to see the more radical and experimental aspects of what Stendhal was doing in his supposedly "flat" texts. Jefferson masterfully deploys the theories of Roland Barthes, in particular, to show the different codes at work in Stendhal's major works, in much the same way that Barthes himself does with Stendhal's contemporary, Honoré de Balzac. I realize that it doesn't help that Jefferson's book has a plain and unpromisingly literal title, that its horrible orange cover makes it seem like a dull academic tome, that it focuses on a writer who is sorely underappreciated in the English-speaking world, and that its rarity and price can put it out of reach of all but the most enterprising reader (although a reissue of the book by Cambridge University Press in 2008 has helped). Nonetheless, reading Stendhal's remarkable works and having them illuminated by Jefferson's dexterous analysis has been one of the most important and pleasures intellectual adventures of my life.

Review # 2 was written on 2014-12-16 00:00:00 Lawrence Leith Literally enjoyed reading this book, something that for me is a bit unusual, considering the fact that its a book about the understanding of a man about another man. To me, its a hard task, specially in the case of George Bataille. Or maybe I just haven't found good books like this one around. It's not perfect, but the impact it had on me was perfect. I still remember it and have some regard about it. The main thing about this book is, it doesn't try to make Georges Bataille a hero nor a loser, which is something that usually happens, specially when a man is known for being a little extreme. This book turns George Bataille against himself, exposing the things that are understood to be good and bad in his work and in a way in his personality(but its very non confrontational in this quality), and what good things we can isolate from both sides. Beautiful.