Reviews for Environment The Science Behind The Stories (CUSTOM for Ball State University)

The average rating for Environment The Science Behind The Stories (CUSTOM for Ball State University) based on 2 reviews is 5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2020-03-26 00:00:00 Jeremy Struthers Interesting at first, but gets depressing. It keeps switching between Koran and science bouncing back and forth getting crazier and more weirdly specific. I'm not a believer and this book is obviously for believers, I think ones with little scientific understanding to use scientific words to make Jinn sound plausible. I just think the Jinn are interesting, I don't think they're real but if they are I don't see them as "logically" being psychic clouds of carbon dioxide.

Review # 2 was written on 2014-06-25 00:00:00 Travis Schatz "The future is disorder." ― Tom Stoppard, Arcadia “The unpredictable and the predetermined unfold together to make everything the way it is.” ― Tom Stoppard, Arcadia Half of what draws me to physics, to theory, to Feynman and Fermat, to Wittgenstein and Weber, is the energy that boils beyond the theory. The force living just beyond the push. I'm not alone. Many of my favorite authors (Cormac McCarthy, Thomas Pynchon, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe) and musicians (Mahler, Beethoven, etc) all dance around this same wicked fire. This burn of the natural world, this magic of the unknown, is what draws me to read physics and philosophy as an absolute amature. There are pieces and fractures in these books that actually DON'T escape me. They hit my brain and spin and keep spinning forever. I imagine this is something felt also by Gleick, one of the top tier science writers out there. My big grievance with this book is it falls too short. His narrative is compelling, yes, the stories are interesting, sure, but he doesn't grab the central characters as well as a new journalist like John McPhee does. He floats too far above the actual science and complexity. He shows you pictures and dances around the pools of chaos and clouds of complexity, but never actually puts the reader INTO the churning water or shoots the reader into energized, cumuliform heaps. This is a book for an advanced HS senior or an average college Freshman. It is pop-science and definitely has its place. This is a book that is more about translating the story of the science (not the science) for NOT the layman, but really the lazy layman. That is probably one of the reasons it did so well. Anyway, I'm glad I read it, but just wish it was deeper, thicker, and way less predictable.