Reviews for Virgil and the Augustan Reception

The average rating for Virgil and the Augustan Reception based on 2 reviews is 4.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2019-05-04 00:00:00 Dif Sincre Well, if you're onboard with (post) Lacanian psychoanalysis this will be up your alley. Otherwise this study of the "thanatoerotophobic tradition" might not be your cup of tea, and remember that, in advice Staten gives to readers of Lacan which applies equally well to Staten's own work, "One might wish to follow him when he does so, but at least one should know to what metaphysics one is declaring allegiance" (182).

Review # 2 was written on 2009-01-14 00:00:00 Natalie Bartlett It's medieval France, a time before TV, movies, sports. What did one do for entertainment? Tell stories of course! Bards and entertainers traveled the courts plying their trade, and in the 1200's the story of the Holy Grail was one of the favourites. Each one took the basic pagan tale, Christianized it of course, and made it his own, changing it freely to suit his audience. Several have passed down to us in written form, and the author attempts here to trace the connections back to the pagan tales for each. For example, the bloody spear which pierced the Lord perhaps arose from a spear that paralyzed an Irish chieftain which appears in older Irish stories. The name Pelles could be a derivation of the Welsh king Beli. That sort of thing. It is one historian's opinion of course, and I'm certain other equally scholarly types would disagree with certain points. But it is an interesting read, weaving the actual text with the analysis. Recommend it.