Reviews for Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas

The average rating for Introduction to Critical Theory: Horkheimer to Habermas based on 2 reviews is 3.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2008-04-24 00:00:00 Steven Maldonado Jr. I believe there's a 1990 edition where, presumably, Held takes account of the relations between poststructuralism (and its iterations) and critical theory. But I'd say that this edition (1980) may be stronger for not having this material in it, as it becomes all the more astonishing how much poststructuralism--including its feminist versions--owes to critical theory. There are differences, of course (see Held's (approving?) account of Marcuse on mastering 'nature'); but the differences are not of the nature of a radical break. Apart from being a reference, the book's value may lie in its preventing students of theory--me, for instance--from thinking that because Derrida et al. surprised us, that they emerged ex nihilo rather than from an already thriving intellectual tradition. In our arrogance, I think we too often mistake our own astonishment, and the astonishment of an uneducated press, for the astonishment of intellectuals who may not have been astonished at all. The book's final third is on Habermas. After seeing that we were about the enter into a discussion of unrestricted rational discussions in the public sphere, I skipped it, since Habermas's unreconstructed humanism is of no value to my work on animals. So I can't rightly be said to have finished this book.

Review # 2 was written on 2015-03-31 00:00:00 William Jones Critical Theory arises out of the disillusionment of several Western Marxists on the failure of proletarian revolution to occur in Western industrialized states. And so it turns out that Karl Marx's prophecy of the inevitable collapse of Western capitalism simply didn't come true. Therefore, these Western Marxists feel the need to reevaluate Marxism and examine on how the capitalist system managed to survive in defiance to Marx's prediction. I found David Held's introduction to thinkers such as Adorno, Horkheimer, Marcuse and Habermas as illuminating in highlighting their similarities and differences. The term Frankfurt School itself is not a homogeous school of thought; it is composed of varying opinions with similar goal: that of making Marxist thoughts relevant to the contemporary (1930s-1970s) situation. I'm not a Marxist, but I'm attracted to the Frankfurt School's critique of contemporary popular culture, in which I believe as being relevant in my country. And I found the School's assertion that reality is historically rooted (and hence, subjected to change by active critiquing and agency) to be highly fascinating. But you won't find any set of doctrine on how to change society from them. The Frankfurt School does not provide us with easy answers. I won't rate this book because there are parts of it that are still beyond my comprehension, such as most of Habermas's ideas. I shall return to it later for a second (or third, or fourth) reading. Although the book is supposed to be an Introduction, a basic knowledge of Marxism (or Sociology and Philosophy in general) is required for a more thorough enjoyment of this book.