Reviews for Pulp and Paper Chemistry and Chemical Technology

The average rating for Pulp and Paper Chemistry and Chemical Technology based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2014-01-10 00:00:00 Jenny Hayden As far as I'm concerned, you have to go at books like this all out, with full suspension of disbelief and a great willingness to accept an awful lot of things that fight for other logical argument in your head whilst you're reading it. Fortunately, this, I can do. I grew up reading von Däniken and similar in abundance, and this fits nicely into that sort of reading: although it's much more human-centric than von Däniken, it takes the same leap from premise to conclusion, and has that same boundless joy and amazement at its heart. There's something wonderful about letting yourself go with every 'discovery', every idea, every 'perhaps' in this book, and, as with all similar books, personally, I'm more inclined to accept that there are as many grains of truth in there as there are red herrings. I know enough about some of the points to know that some of the author's conclusions are, in this case, mistaken, and his willingness to accept individual testimony as fact in some places spoils the author's method a little, but, still. I'm more than happy to say that that doesn't spoil it as a whole. There's plenty to wonder and ponder in this book, and it takes the mind to some fine places. I also greatly appreciate the worldwide focus of this book, which includes the Americas, the Arctic, the Antarctic, Persia, Sumeria, the entire world, for a change, rather than simply Peru, or Mexico, or Egypt. The piecemeal construction makes it both easy and frustrating to read, for where you might want more detail, the next topic is quickly introduced, but at the same time, fascinating parallels are well-illustrated. If you can come to this book without pre-conception and with your cynic's hat left firmly locked in the cupboard, there's plenty to reward. If not, you might want something with more facts and figures and 'evidence' than this offers.

Review # 2 was written on 2014-01-10 00:00:00 Gus Ledoux The seeming roller coaster of the rise and fall of civilization is made even more questioning with “out-of-place artifacts” through into the mix. Secrets of the Lost Races by Rene Noorbergen examines these items and accounts from across the globe of modern-day technology to theorize that these are leftover knowledge from an antediluvian civilization that was slowly lost. Using the early chapters of Genesis and very peculiar fossil finds, Noorbergen makes the case for the Biblical Flood then uses the same early Biblical chapters to make a case for a highly advanced civilization that the Ark survivors remembered enough to reboot civilization that would slowly decline as thousands of years past as the knowledge was slowly lost. Throughout the book Noorbergen tackles various issues from potentially ancient sourced maps of the globe before European explorers created their own, the apparent physical evidence of nuclear war in the ancient past along with texts describing it, and the supposed concurrent existence of Stone Age cave men and various civilizations that were suppose to be thousands of years apart. To give this book a chance one must believe in the Biblical Flood or be willing to be open to it as well as be open to Noorbergen’s interruption with it; one also has to account with the fact that this book was originally published over 40 years ago with looking at the evidence especially since further research has discounted it (the Zeno brothers) or more of a question mark. Noorbergen is very insistent that the theories of von Daniken or Sitchin that advanced technology is from extraterrestrials doesn’t make sense even though his book is very much in their vain. Yet in trying to fit in so much in around 200 pages, Noorbergen misses out on better analytical explanations. Secrets of the Lost Races is an intriguing use of evidence that “ancient astronaut” theorists have brought further to a different purpose. While Rene Noorbergen’s interest in the Flood and Noah’s Ark is various obvious, it doesn’t take away from his theory but adds emphasis to it. If you’re interested in an alternate view of history this is something you might be interested in.