Reviews for America at 1750: A Social Portrait

The average rating for America at 1750: A Social Portrait based on 2 reviews is 4 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2018-10-03 00:00:00 Daniel McGovern Throughout my reading life I have often dived into and been impressed with the book of Douglas R. Hofstadter. When reading about that Hofstadter it is often pointed out that he is different from this historian Hofstadter. So, I decided, why not read the "other" Hofstadter? I am glad I did. This brisk, accessible American history explores the pre-Revolutionary War American Colonial Era and the foundations laid there not only for that War but for much of what makes America unique. I find it really breaks along three fault lines: 1) Institutionalized Servitude 2) Middle Class socioeconomics and, 3) Evangelism. "Institutionalized Servitude" includes not only slavery, but indentured servants and gradations between. Endemic during this era it seems to me this bred into the nation nativisit (anti-immigrant; Benjamin Franklin decrying German immigration) and even racist beliefs that still surface today. The Middle Class is perhaps the least explored of the three, but is an important pillar to the American cult of personality as well as a a further key differentiation to the Old World and especially England, those broadening a gulf that opened the door to rebellion. Evangelism around charismatic preachers in a mesh of post-Puritan sects added a curious and even hypocritical blend of openness. (Since no denomination was national, denominational pluralism supported an acceptance of contrasting [religious] ideas if implicitly only Xtian ones.) However, this division fostered regionalist tumult and a broad adherence to xenophobic fundamentalism supporting the shared belief, among other things, that Providence lights the way for America and a susceptibility to demagogue led revivalism.

Review # 2 was written on 2020-11-08 00:00:00 Jeff Beerman This was the last of Richard Hofstadter's books. It was not completed at the time of his death. However, Alfred A. Knopf decided it was well worth publishing what chapters had been written. Some excellent insights are here, but some topics are omitted - perhaps to have been included in the final work. The rivalry between European imperial powers - Spain, France, and England - and their attempts to gain hegemony over Indigenous Americans and the fur trade is one of the missing topics. Relations between colonial Americans and indigenous nations, in general, are missing as well. If you want a far more complete history see Colin Calloway's book.