Reviews for A Modern Approach to Regression with R

The average rating for A Modern Approach to Regression with R based on 2 reviews is 3.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2014-04-14 00:00:00 Scott Farmer I'd like to read the whole thing some time: I've only skimmed it to review the material. But it seems solid, including several helpful ideas I wasn't familiar with. * p.103 and p.252: some great flowcharts, to make sure you don't miss the key steps, for simple and multiple linear regression * p.159: residual plots do NOT clearly indicate which part of the model is misspecified; e.g. the plots may look like there's nonconstant variance, but it might actually be that the mean function is badly specified * p.161: try Sliced Inverse Regression (Li 1991) to determine the number and kinds of transformations required on the various variables if you can't visualize them all at once * p.166: added-variable plot example: sometimes plotting Y|X(-i) vs Xi|X(-i) shows that some of the Xi are unhelpful once you have the other variables in the model already * p.176: either try transforming (X1,...,Xp,Y) to joint multivariate normality using multivariate Box-Cox; or try transforming all the X's to joint multivar normality, then fit Yhat from these transformed X's, then use an inverse response plot to choose the transformation for Y, i.e. plot Y vs Yhat to find a good g s.t. g(Y)=Yhat (see p.171) * p.192: marginal mean plots: scatterplot Y vs Xi, loess Y ~ Xi, and loess Yhat ~ Xi (where Yhat is from full model on all X's), to see whether the full model looks good marginally * p.238: remember that if you do variable selection first, then your p-values will be underestimates of the true p-values you "should" be getting, i.e. they're biased towards falsely appearing significant: "the sampling properties of post-model-selection estimators are typically significantly different from the nominal distributions that arise if a fixed model is supposed"

Review # 2 was written on 2019-06-03 00:00:00 Ivan Micallef I wish that the R code was in the book not in a separate book website. I also wish there was more explanation of how to interpret R outputs. This is a common complaint I have iwth many R textbooks though. It's not enough to say, "You can see in the output that..." you need to explain how you see that? What exactly is indicating that conclusion... Also it could use some updating. Some of the R code uses deprecated functions that I had a hard time finding the updated functions for. I also had trouble with some topics like how to use R to determine Box-Cox transformations on predictor variables and how to determine the right weight to use for weighted regression. Maybe it's just because some of the math was beyond my comprehension, but there didn't seem to be an explanation at all let aloe one I couldn't understand.