Reviews for The Range of Interpretation

The average rating for The Range of Interpretation based on 2 reviews is 4.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2019-05-25 00:00:00 Gabriel Hernandez راجع به بدي ترجمه و كتاب سازي و خلاصه كم كاري ناشر به اندازه كافي نوشته ام. چيزي كه راجع به خود كتاب ميشود گفت اينكه عنوانش دقيقا با محتواش همخواني ندارد. يعني اولا اين كتاب بيشتر از يك مقدمه يا درآمد است و ثانيا بخش سينمايي اش هم تنك و كم مايه و طفيلي ادبيات است. در واقع همان هم كه هست مسئله اش اقتباس سينمايي از متن ادبي ست نه روايت در ادبيات. نكته ي پاياني هم اينكه كتاب به شدت مبهم و مجمل است. البته نميدانم اين ابهام چقدرش به خاطر ترجمه اش و چقدر در متن اصلي هم هست ولي به هر حال ارجاعات، اصطلاحات و نقل قول ها بدون توضيح درست و درمان بيان شده اند و به همين خاطر متن در خيلي جاها گنگ است.

Review # 2 was written on 2017-08-14 00:00:00 Rhea Gargour When I was in college, State University of New York at Potsdam the English Department offered as a trial, Critical Theory course that could be credited for English or Political Science. I elected for it to go towards my Political Science major even though my minor was Communications, part of the English department. The course was with Professor Keesey with Critical Theory Since 1965 by Hazard Adams and Leroy Searle (1986 - University Press of Florida) as the required text. This course and required reading remain at the core of my Civil Public Discourse advocacy. The reading itself has traveled with me for many years however got lost in a household move. To the credit of the current SUNY Potsdam English Department Chair, his invaluable assistance in locating the book made it possible for me to locate it for replacement. This is an invaluable resource and I highly recommend it for those already engaged in and those entering into Critical Theory, Linguistics, Governance and Societal; Civil Public Discourse. [Greg Kelly, SUNY Potsdam '89 Political Science~Communications]