Reviews for Let's make it clear

The average rating for Let's make it clear based on 2 reviews is 3.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2016-01-30 00:00:00 Serena Odle This is absolutely amazing! I loved it. The guy can write, better than any person I've ever read. He can critique pretty well too. He gives insights that only a genius can give. This is just like the title says, Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lectures. He writes in a way completely opposite of the typical modern professor who can't write a single sentence without pretentious jargon. He even critiques those types of writers. If you want to edit, profess, speak, write, or just compose something, here is your guide. Make sure, however, that you know grammar pretty well, otherwise things might go over your head. I didn't have to read it for a class, but I did read it for fun; and I had a lot of fun with it, because, well, there is a lot to read. If you have to read it, just like anything you are assigned, good luck enjoying it. I knew going into it I didn't need luck, I had a strong desire to learn from this master rhetor. I gave away my copy of it to a friend, but I'll get another copy and write a more detailed review. Until then, the only thing left to say is that make sure you have a bookstand...or really strong wrists ;)

Review # 2 was written on 2016-12-17 00:00:00 Jason Yaunk We must always remember that there are few facts more important to a successful life than establishing Blair's place in Eighteenth-Century British rhetorical theory. I can't stress this enough because the psychological-epistemological accounts of those years were at the very foundation of Blair's sense of style and eloquence. The shift away from the influence of the orator was made possible by the printing press. When 'our' minds were altered by that technology, scanning and grapheme awareness overrode the importance of active listening. The old model was 'let's listen to the speaker' while, in the modern era, 'let's read the printed word.' How do you hold an audience using only the printed word? This is the fundamental problem. Because humans are more than those who scan a screen or printed text; they also verbalize, they also need to hear a voice. What had been the excellence of the rhetor, the one who speaks to others, is now the author, the one who writes for others. This is why we are thoroughly confused as a group of people: do we want literacy or do we want rhetoric? We need both.