Wonder Club world wonders pyramid logo
×

Reviews for Environmental philosophy

 Environmental philosophy magazine reviews

The average rating for Environmental philosophy based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.has a rating of 3 stars

Review # 1 was written on 2012-03-17 00:00:00
0was given a rating of 3 stars Richard Gibson
Probaly the single most important books to shape my mind
Review # 2 was written on 2014-08-02 00:00:00
0was given a rating of 3 stars W Scott Roesener
I wish I had read this long ago. I found the Deep Ecology of Arne Naess much more nuanced than what I have read in EarthFirst! (maybe more philosophical compared to the more applied works of Dave Foreman and others). In particular, the thinking was more Spinozan or phenomenological than I had expected, with strong discussions around gestalt and the embodied subject. "Gestalt formation crosses boundaries between what is conventionally classed as thinking as separated from emotion. The tertiary qualities tend to be separated from the gestalts and referred to as merely subjective emotions. The overcoming of this prejudice has profound consequences for environmentalism" and Naess suggests that the "Verbal deterioration of gestalts implies deterioration of the culture." This perspective reminds me of McGilchrist's Master and His Emissary with the drift from right to left brain dominance. How does one sustain a more holistic worldview in a linear, abstracted left-brain world?


Click here to write your own review.


Login

  |  

Complaints

  |  

Blog

  |  

Games

  |  

Digital Media

  |  

Souls

  |  

Obituary

  |  

Contact Us

  |  

FAQ

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!!