Reviews for On writing romance

The average rating for On writing romance based on 2 reviews is 2.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2013-11-13 00:00:00 John Armstrong Page 168 of this book has succinctly explained why I cannot read m/f romance: "Here's how to make your heroine's dialogue more realistic . . . Check for bragging: women tend to talk about their accomplishments and themselves in a self-deprecating fashion . . . can you rephrase her comments in order to make her laugh at herself? Check for aggressiveness:women tend to be indirect and manipulative . . . add approval-seeking comments and suggestions that masquerade as questions. Check for details: Women notice styles; they know what colors go together (and which don't); and they know the right words to describe fashion, colours, and designs. Can you ramp up the level of specific detail? Check for emotions: women tend to bubble over with emotion, with the exception that they're generally hesitant to express anger and tend to do so in a passive . . . manner." Fuck this shit.

Review # 2 was written on 2014-09-12 00:00:00 Gaetane Lanthier A good starting-point for someone interested in writing in this genre, but it also has a few problems that make it a book I can't recommend. The book begins with a description of the various sub-genres of romance'and includes gay and erotic romance, which I liked. Michaels goes into detail how to research romances, and I enjoyed reading this. The chapter on characterization didn't offer anything new, though I didn't disagree with it until I read the list of questions at the end, intended to help writers "get to know" their characters. What astrological sign was he born under? What kind of music does he enjoy? Maybe it's just me, but I've never found this kind of "what's her favorite color" list useful, unless the story will involve colors in some way. The chapter on conflict was great; I especially liked how Michaels differentiated between the short-term problem which brings the hero and heroine together, and the larger picture which keeps them apart. Not to mention the ways a writer can (inadvertently) sabotage the relationship. What sank the book for me, though, was the section on dialogue, titled "The Battle of the Sexes". Well, at least it gives fair warning. This is how you're supposed to "make your heroine's dialogue more realistic if you're a male writer", because us female writers have that down pat, so we get the section on how to write the hero's man-talk instead : Check for aggressiveness. Women tend to be indirect and manipulative; even an assertive woman usually considers the effect her statement is likely to have before she makes it. Can you add questions to her dialogue, or add approval-seeking comments and suggestions that masquerade as questions? When I read this, I turned to the start of the book to check if it was published in 1980. Nope, 2007. But apparently, what's self-confidence and competence in a man is aggressiveness (such an unattractive quality!) in a woman. Check for emotions. Women tend to bubble over with emotion, with the exception that they're generally hesitant to express anger and tend to do so in a passive or euphemistic manner. If you need your heroine to be angry, can you give her a really good reason for yelling? Just finding these sections to quote annoyed me all over again. Which was a pity, because the last chapter, on revising a manuscript, is helpful and I didn't notice anything too sexist there. So if you can ignore the part on dialogue, or if it doesn't bother you, this book could be useful. For my part, though, On Writing Romance won't be joining my keeper shelf.