Reviews for Making Sense Out of Sorrow

The average rating for Making Sense Out of Sorrow based on 2 reviews is 4 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2017-04-04 00:00:00 Brian White Along with Kierkegaard, Soloviev is one of my favorite Christian philosophers. This book is a collection of essays that follow the themes of the title. Some of the ideas were later disavowed by Soloviev; namely, utopianism and a church unity realizable within history. There's some things in here that are close to being almost dispensationalist -a system I find abhorrent for many reasons that I won't go into in this review. Soloviev appears to believe that Judaism itself is a part of God's plan; this idea puts him in line with dispensationalism unfortunately. I do agree with Soloviev that God has a plan for the Jewish people, but my conviction is that that plan is for them to accept Jesus Christ, not that He is going to bless them with a thousand year utopia and grant them faith by sight like dispensationalists believe -which is completely contradictory in fact. His essays on fraudulent Christianity were some of the better ones in the book. I am glad I bought and read this book. It's a good addition to the books I already own and have read by him.

Review # 2 was written on 2011-07-03 00:00:00 Rob Miller When I pulled this book from the boxed set, I inadvertently broke the sequencing scheme I had for reading this series. I'd intended to read them in order from "most exotic" to "least exotic," landing last on Roman Catholicism, the religion I was raised in. That would have placed this one *after* Islam, which is instead the one I'll be reading next. As expected, I found this one to be the most accessible so far, because of the clear line of descent between Judaism and Christianity. I found it interesting that some features of my birth religion, such as "Catholic guilt," actually arise in Judaism and are simply transmitted through that descent. It probably also helped that the author is a genuine evangelist for his religion, and speaks of it as if it were Truth, and the reader a (potential) believer. This makes many concepts much less abstract. The book is organized in a way that I found somewhat more rational than the previous volumes, but this may simply be a consequence of the cultural affinities between religions. Each section is amply supported by writings from rabbis of cultural and historical significance. These writings can help put some things in perspective that might be challenging even given that cultural affinity, such as modern Zionism and the warlike nature of early Jewish society. (I generally prefer an anthropological / archaeological view over a religious one when seeking rationale for such things, but it doesn't hurt to have multiple perspectives casting light on the subject.) Perhaps inadvertently, the author seems to undermine one aspect of his case with a couple of the readings, which apparently contradict each other. (On the other hand, this may be his attempt to illustrate the inherent mysteries of faith, and human inability to grasp cosmic subtleties.) We're told in the chapter on Doctrine that human nature is very akin to godlike nature, and that sin alienates humanity from his true nature, thereby imposing its own punishment in process. A few pages later, however, a reading makes the point that it's all too easy to fall into sin, and that as we age, this tendency becomes greater. This suggests to me that human nature is less godlike than sinful, and I'm not entirely sure the author was aware that the near-juxtaposition of these arguments would come across as contradictory. Maybe, though, it was intentional, with the objective of pointing out that of such (apparent) contradictions faith is made. I could, and should, have finished this book a couple weeks before I did. Having had a couple loaner books dropped in my lap about two-thirds of the way through, I took a break from this to work on those in order to return them as quickly as possible. Don't let my excessively-long read time dissuade you from this book, if you've an interest in religion. Not counting the References section, it's only 246 pages, and comparatively breezy.