Reviews for O. O. Howard, Union General

The average rating for O. O. Howard, Union General based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2012-03-13 00:00:00 Mike Sanders Author John R. Bumgarner, M.D., a North Carolina native who passed away a few years ago, was for many years a cardiologist in my local community, which added to my interest in his WWII memoir. Following graduation from the Medical College of Virginia in 1939 Bumgarner began his internship and also became an officer in the Army Medical Corps reserve. In summer of 1940 he was directed to active duty believing his service might last a year. He took his long distance mission to the Philippines in stride working at a field hospital handling primarily gonorrhea and other venereal diseases within the military community. Months later on December 7, 1941 his world was rocked with word of the Japanese bombing at Peal Harbor. The Philippines fell to Japanese control and on April 10, 1942 Bumgarner and other medical personnel became prisoners of war. Transported to another field hospital he would soon be treating survivors of the well known Bataan “Death March”. American soldiers, who previously craved sex around Manila, now focused their primary thoughts and primitive instincts to the basic necessity of food. Bumgarner’s cases now consisted of life threatening malaria, beriberi, tuberculosis, dysentery and diphtheria along with basic vitamin deficiency and starvation. Dr. Bumgarner survived the war and his quick read memoir complete with drawings serves as a true historical document.

Review # 2 was written on 2019-04-15 00:00:00 Benedict Santos This book stems from an idea that is at the same time thought-provoking, insane and very tangible. That is probably the reason why it is so scary. It is a classic of the victorian era, but for some reason probably not as famous as many other fictions of the “gothic” movement and indeed not as well known as a few other novels by H.G. Wells (such as The Time Machine, The Invisible Man or The War of the Worlds). But it definitely deserves to be read again today. The plot is rather simple: a castaway by the name of Prendick ends up on an uncharted island in the Pacific Ocean and meets the infamous Dr. Moreau and his assistant. Dr. Moreau is known for having practiced vivisection experiments some years before in London and, as a result, was excluded from the scientific community. Prendick later discovers that Moreau has been carrying on with his experiments and has created some monstrous beasts, while trying to turn animals into some wretched semblance of human beings. This discovery is planted and built up with some amount of suspense right from the first pages until it is fully exposed around the middle of the novel, in the chapter entitled “Doctor Moreau Explains”. The second part of the book is a nail-biting account of the catastrophic series of events that follow the dreadful discovery. Obviously, “The Island of Dr. Moreau” is in the same vein as Gustav Meyrink’s The Golem or Shelley’s Frankenstein (it can also evoke earlier figures like Shakespeare’s Prospero and Caliban in The Tempest, or even Shylock’s most famous lines in The Merchant of Venice). It is about the hubris of men attempting to imitate God and create a human being with the help of science. The result is invariably dreadful and deadly. Wells original treatment of this theme rests upon the idea of vivisectional experiments carried on animals in an isolate place: mammals are surgically and chemically modified to look and behave as much as humans as they possibly can. But the mental distress caused by this novel lies of the fact that these attempts are always cruel, disastrous and abortive. The Isserley of Under the Skin is a distant relative of Moreau's creatures. In some way, this book presages WWII’s Nazi’s “scientific” testings or even today's plausible out-of-line genetic engineering initiatives. Wells closes the book with these words: “the manufacture of monsters - an perhaps even quasi-human monsters - is within the possibilities of vivisection.” But, more deeply, perhaps, the horror lies in the fact that this fiction shows how feeble and unreal our human values are (including religious ones), and how easily men can fall back below animality.