Reviews for Mandatory vs. recommended prophylaxis ophthalmia neonatorum

The average rating for Mandatory vs. recommended prophylaxis ophthalmia neonatorum based on 2 reviews is 3 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2011-06-09 00:00:00 Heath Manuel I disagree with the other reviewer of this book. Yes, there are religious elements mentioned, but they seem to add more dimension and considerations to the topics explored. This is small notebook sized book, so no one should expect a detailed exploration of any topic. It touches lightly on the meaty issues in medical ethics without much fuss or fanfare. It's preliminary and it's a guide. So that means if anyone wants to explore any particular topic in further detail, this book would only be useful at providing a basic grasp of the general issues. This book is targeted towards British medical or health students, so don't expect deep philosophical exploration of any kind, you will be disappointed if that was the case. This guide is inoffensive and a good start for anyone interested in medical ethics but with little to no knowledge of it.

Review # 2 was written on 2012-09-07 00:00:00 Matthew Curley A juvenile take on ethics with a poor disguised religious bent and contempt for those without one.