Wonder Club world wonders pyramid logo
×

Reviews for The Sociology Of Ethnicity

 The Sociology Of Ethnicity magazine reviews

The average rating for The Sociology Of Ethnicity based on 2 reviews is 4.5 stars.has a rating of 4.5 stars

Review # 1 was written on 2020-05-16 00:00:00
2004was given a rating of 5 stars Johnny Jaco
I'm slowly enveloping myself in race critical theories or critical race theories (though somehow the second has been to some extent appropriated by the legal writings on race), it is immensely rewarding and I have found this a great place to start. It is a broad collection of very different kinds of work, a great way to get a sense of what kinds of strands critical race theory contains (though the legal aspect is pretty absent, I don't know enough yet perhaps to comment knowingly on this split nor would I really be able to note a glaring absence at this point). I also don't know enough to evaluate the claim that the glory days of critical race theory was the 80s and 90s, but given the many reprintings and that my copy is from 2008, it seems this remains a key collection. All of the work is from the 1970s onwards, and it covers a wide range, from a selection from Said's Orientalism to the Black theoretical heavyweights to European studies to third-world feminism, from discourse to literature to affirmative action policy and personal reflection. I know I am biased, but it contains one of the most impossible to read yet illuminating articles by Stuart Hall "Race, Articulation, and Societies Structured in Dominance", along with a beauty among beauties -- Hall's commentary on the same, which gives it context and more theoretical grounding and which I found to be so immensely helpful. I really liked the structure in fact, the collection of original works in chronological order, followed by commentaries in thematic order to round it off. Some of those commentaries were really lovely and helpful to read, particularly when written by the author themselves, ranging from explanatory to personal/autobiographical/theoretical context. My only critique was that you had no idea in what context the pieces were written or the date without flipping back to the acknowledgments page. I think in a collection of some kind a brief paragraph was really necessary to introduce the work. There's also the cover, I've just been staring at it trying to figure out why on earth they chose it. Covers are important, and this is an unfortunate one that ensures no one will just pick the book up on a whim, but still, it's worth picking up.
Review # 2 was written on 2019-11-02 00:00:00
2004was given a rating of 4 stars Laurence Bassett
If this is your first book on race theories, you made a good choice!


Click here to write your own review.


Login

  |  

Complaints

  |  

Blog

  |  

Games

  |  

Digital Media

  |  

Souls

  |  

Obituary

  |  

Contact Us

  |  

FAQ

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!!