Reviews for Anthropology

The average rating for Anthropology based on 2 reviews is 4.5 stars.

Review # 1 was written on 2014-04-03 00:00:00 Gregory L Golden 101 stories, 101 words each. 101 quirky little laments about lost loves, unforgettable loves, obsessive loves and just plain disturbing loves. The stories are both devastatingly sad and uproariously hilarious: --------------------------------------------------------- Pieces They kidnapped my girlfriend and asked for an awful lot of money before they would even think about giving her back. I was grateful for the peace and quiet, so I wasn't in too much of a hurry to settle up. After a while, they started mailing me little pieces of her, starting with one ear in a soap dish. For some reason, they weren't lowering the ransom. It doesn't make sense. They seem to think I'd pay as much for a girlfriend with no thumbs, ears, nose or nipples as I would for one with all her bits still there. --------------------------------------------------------- Reminded me a little of 88 Lines About 44 Women, only not as dirty and a helluva lot funnier.

Review # 2 was written on 2010-01-29 00:00:00 Roger Rocha Dan Rhodes makes micro-fiction writing look pimps. His lauded collection, Anthropology, collects 101 stories, each approx 101 words (the word count isn't rigidly adhered to), and over the course of 200 pages, breaks down the bulk of a billion novels about heartbreak, obsessive lovers, hapless male losers, and pouting femme fatales into hilarious, touching and poignant mini-stories. I have been a doubter of micro-fiction for some time, but reading this collection has opened my eyes to the possibilities of the form. How often have you written a meandering story of some 2000 words, only to realise the idea could easily be encapsulated in one tight block of brilliance? Rhodes takes the overdone subject matter, slathers his vignettes with wit, insight and pathos, creating a tight set fit for the modern ADHD reader. I still abhor the prevalence of micro-fiction, esp. on the net, where everyone is meant to have the attention span of a Chelsea bimbo, but a unified collection like this is inspired. Had Rhodes written one of these pieces and posted it on a website somewhere, it would have faded into insignificance quicker than a bull's belch - locking antlers forever with the million or so other attempts at sublime cleverness and Wildeian pithiness. However, because Rhodes has sunk his gnashers into this mammoth undertaking - this obsessive pursuit of the ultimate conciseness - this project feels as deep as a novel or a short story. So… hurrah to Rhodes to converting me to the form and saving me from a depressing world where anyone can commit 100 words to a 'submit' box and become a four-minute interwoob sensation. He may not have the length or breadth, but he certainly has the depth.