Wonder Club world wonders pyramid logo
×

Reviews for The Skeptic: A Life of H.L. Mencken

 The Skeptic magazine reviews

The average rating for The Skeptic: A Life of H.L. Mencken based on 2 reviews is 3.5 stars.has a rating of 3.5 stars

Review # 1 was written on 2008-07-14 00:00:00
2003was given a rating of 4 stars Stacy Hooper
"I never wash my hands after taking a leak. That's the cleanest part of me." - H.L. Mencken. H.L. Mencken was Hunter S. Thompson before Hunter S. Thompson was Hunter S. Thompson. In fact, I decided to look into this H.L. character upon coming across a passing comment referring to him in Gonzo. HST was a fan. Well, perhaps not a fan, but certainly aware of him, aware of Mencken's contribution to American letters and therefore an influence and forefather of Thompson's own potent prose and inimitable personality. H. L. Mencken paved the road that Hunter S. Thompson came screaming down with his peyote-fueled typewriter of rage and style. These two men, forefathers of modern journalism, have a lot in common and their similarities illuminate the world they were a part of and criticized so effectively. They were both journalists, columnists, and editors, fierce critics of culture and politics. As Teachout shares in The Skeptic, "Mencken responded to Prohibition by selling his car and using the proceeds to purchase a large stock of "the best wines and liquors I could find," stored in a homemade basement vault whose door bore a custom-painted sign emblazoned with a skull and crossbones: "This vault is protected by a device releasing Chlorine Gas under 200 pounds pressure. Enter it at your own Risk." HST would have been proud. H.L. Mencken gained widespread popularity and exposure with the infamous Scopes trial and HST gained notoriety while covering the '72 Presidential Campaign. Both men's success was intimately tied with magazines. "I note what you say about your aspiration to edit a magazine," Mencken wrote to William Saroyan in 1936. "I am sending you by this mail a six-chambered revolver. Load it and fire every one into your head. You will thank me after you get to Hell and learn from other editors how dreadful their job was on earth." And as all great men seem to be, both H.L. Mencken and Hunter S. Thompson were flawed. Mencken was an anti-Semite and Thompson a homophobe. However useful an introduction to H.L. Mencken Teachout's biography was, I did find it significantly lacking in two particular arenas. First of all, it failed to share an adequate amount of Mencken's own prose. Once the myth and drug-fascination with Hunter S. Thompson has waned, his legacy will be his words. And no matter how intriguing of a character Mencken was in his own right, his heritage seems to be the same. So I wanted more of Mencken's writing. Second, Mencken was an important American writer who had a significant influence on modern journalism and I wish Teachout had provided more of an analysis and study of Mencken's lasting presence in our contemporary era. The closest Teachout got was a mere parenthetical aside: "Had they [conservatives] known of the extent to which his [Mencken] work in the twenties helped lay the intellectual groundwork for the America-hating adversary culture of the sixties, they might have repudiated him altogether." But this second objection is probably more a manifestation of my own bias and interest in the similarities between Mencken and Thompson. Though each man harbored intense and undeniable prejudices of the first order, they pursued sham and hypocrisy in all arenas of public life with unflagging diligence. But Mencken, faithfully secular, touched on religion too, which I haven't come across much by HST on the topic. Did he weigh in on religion ever? At the end of The Skeptic, Teachout sees in Mencken "a skepticism so extreme as to issue in philosophical incoherence." But Teachout ultimately concludes that Mencken's relevance and success is not a function of his particular convictions but rather of "the firmly balanced prose rhythms and vigorous diction in which they are couched. It is, in short, a triumph of style." The same can be said of HST. Despite HST's failure to write that great novel, or to extend his initial success any further than the 70s, he lined up words in an order like no one else did. And for that, The Skeptic must be considered a success in that it makes me want to stop reading criticism and biographies of Mencken and instead turn to his books much in the same way that I was wearied by Alex Ross's The Rest is Noise and instead wanted to listen to the music. As always, it's best to shut up and listen.
Review # 2 was written on 2020-11-15 00:00:00
2003was given a rating of 3 stars Scott Mcdonald
"Here the general average of intelligence, of knowledge, of competence, of integrity, of self-respect, of honor is so low that any man who knows his trade, does not fear ghosts, as read fifty good books, and practices the common decencies stands out as brilliantly as a wart on a bald head, and is thrown willy-nilly into a meager and exclusive aristocracy. And here, more than anywhere else that I know of or have heard of, the daily panorama of human existence, of private and communal folly- the unending procession of governmental extortions and chicaneries, of commercial brigandages and throat-slittings, of theological buffooneries, of aesthetic ribaldries, of legal swindles and harlotries, of miscellaneous rogueries, villainies, imbecilities, grotesqueries, and extravagances-is so inordinately gross and preposterous, so perfectly brought up to the highest conceivable amperage, so steadily enriched with an almost fabulous daring and originality, that only the man who was born with a petrified diaphragm can fail to laugh himself to sleep every night, and to awake every morning with all the eager, unflagging expectation of a Sunday-school superintendent touring the Paris peep-shows" (p. 184) HL Mencken (1880-1956) is perhaps Americas most famous literary journalist and most famous for his ability to satirize American society (as he called them, the 'booboisie') and criticize those lofty puritans of old. He is also famous for writing about the American vernacular and using it in a idiosyncratic way to emphasize its originality. Mencken was born in Baltimore to parents of German ancestry. His father - August Mencken - had his own cigar factory. "(August) was a high-tariff Republican who ran a militantly nounion shop and viewed the eight-hour day as "a project of foreign nihilists to undermine and wreck the American Republic"" (p. 25). August was a self-made man who managed to bestow his values onto his son (although HL to run the cigar factory). Event though Mencken went on to become a world famous journalist, he continued to live in the same house his whole life. Mencken was a voracious reader at an early age and his most formative reading experience turned out to be Mark Twain. This showed how one can satirize society and to discover the power of the vernacular to do so. The rest of his life was really the story of a workaholic whose primary calling seemed to be to weed out hypocrisy and to try to right all the wrongs of society. I was drawn to him because I had read many of his quotes and has read he was a libertarian. This turned out not to be the whole truth as he was an Germanophile who had a romantic view of Wilhelmine Germany while being strongly against England. The biography is well written but I found myself mostly interested in the early days of Mencken as it reminded me of myself. I was curious to find out how come he stayed true to his values all his life despite the major changes which occurred in America. One possible explanation is a certain lack of curiosity and a strong belief in oneself. The biography is interesting for those who want to see the America of yesterday whose remnants are still with us today.


Click here to write your own review.


Login

  |  

Complaints

  |  

Blog

  |  

Games

  |  

Digital Media

  |  

Souls

  |  

Obituary

  |  

Contact Us

  |  

FAQ

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!!