|
|
Sold Out
Book Categories |
In The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment, Yale Law Professor Bruce Ackerman argues that the bill of Impeachment against President Clinton, passed in December 1998, expired on January 3rd, 1999, when a new House of Representatives began its term of office. It is unconstitutional for the Senate to begin a trial unless a majority of the newly elected House once again charges the President with "high crimen and misdemeanors."
The newly elected House of 1999 contains 40 new members and five mote Democrats, suggesting that a new House vote could produce a different outcome on one or both of the lameduck articles of impeachment.
| Price | Condition | Delivery | Seller | Action |
| $99.99 | Digital |
| WonderClub |
Collin Harvey
reviewed The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment on January 25, 2021 The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment
Many authors have looked at America, liberty and her relationship with the world, but Widmer does it with a unique intensity and wealth of knowledge and references. Not to mention that it is beautifully written. Even if you are steeped in American history, there is something to be learned on every page.
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish List
X
This item is in your Collection
The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment
X
This Item is in Your Inventory
The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment, , The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment, , The Case Against Lameduck Impeachment to your collection on WonderClub |
