Wonder Club world wonders pyramid logo
×

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision Book

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision
Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision, In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the , Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision has a rating of 3 stars
   2 Ratings
X
Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision, In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the , Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision
3 out of 5 stars based on 2 reviews
5
0 %
4
0 %
3
100 %
2
0 %
1
0 %
Digital Copy
PDF format
1 available   for $99.99
Original Magazine
Physical Format

Sold Out

  • Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision
  • Written by author Lloyd S. Dixon
  • Published by RAND Corporation, December 2002
  • In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the
  • In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the
Buy Digital  USD$99.99

WonderClub View Cart Button

WonderClub Add to Inventory Button
WonderClub Add to Wishlist Button
WonderClub Add to Collection Button

Book Categories

Authors

Preface
Figures
Tables
Summary
Acknowledgments
1Expert Evidence and the Challenge for the Courts1
2Conceptual Analysis of Daubert's Impact on Disposition of Challenged Evidence and Type of Evidence Challenged9
3Data and Methods15
4Changes in Reliability Standards Since Daubert25
5Trends in Factors Entering into the Reliability Assessment37
6Trends in the Other Criteria Used to Assess Expert Evidence47
7Consequences of More-Watchful Gatekeeping53
8Conclusions and Next Steps61
App. ACharacteristics of Sample of Opinions, Elements of Evidence, Experts, and Litigants67
App. BStatistical Approach for Analyzing Changes over Time in Outcomes of Interest77
App. CEvidence that Daubert Was Applied to Cases Filed Before July 199383
App. DStatistical Analysis of Changes in the Decisiveness of General Acceptance85
References89


Login

  |  

Complaints

  |  

Blog

  |  

Games

  |  

Digital Media

  |  

Souls

  |  

Obituary

  |  

Contact Us

  |  

FAQ

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!!

X
WonderClub Home

This item is in your Wish List

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision, In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the , Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

X
WonderClub Home

This item is in your Collection

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision, In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the , Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

X
WonderClub Home

This Item is in Your Inventory

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision, In its 1993 Daubert decision, the United States Supreme Court clarified the standards judges should use in deciding whether to admit expert evidence into federal cases. The Supreme Court directed judges to evaluate the method and reasoning underlying the , Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases since the Daubert Decision

WonderClub Home

You must be logged in to review the products

E-mail address:

Password: