Sold Out
Book Categories |
Foreword xi
Preface xiii
Note on gender-inclusive language xvii
Introduction 1
Aims and Limitations 2
Methodology 4
What Is a Good Argument? 8
Overview 10
Background to the Problem Evil 17
Orthodox Theism 17
The Problem of Evil 23
Philosophical Background 23
Goods and Evils 23
Versions of the Problem of Evil 27
Ethical Theory and the Problem of Evil 30
Historical Background 33
Rowe's Evidential Arguments from Evil 47
The Early Rowe (1978-86) 47
The 1979 Argument 49
The Theological Premise 50
The Factual Premise 51
Wykstra on Rowe's Case in Support of the Factual Premise 55
The Middle Rowe (1988-95) 57
The Factual Premise Revisited 57
The Inference-from P to Q 58
The Structure of the Argument 61
The Late Rowe (1996-present) 62
Rowe's New Evidential Argument 62
Atheism or Agnosticism? 67
Rowe's Resurrection of the 'Middle' Argument from Evil 68
What No Eye Has Seen: The Epistemi Foundations of Wykstra's Cornea Critique 77
The Original Cornea 78
The Problem with C[subscript 1] 82
Cornea and the Principle of Credulity 84
Counterexamples to C[subscript 2]-C[subscript 4] 88
C[subscript 4] and Noseeum Inferences 90
Cornea Applied to Rowe's Evidential Argument 99
Applying C[subscript 4.2] to Rowe's Arguments 99
Rowe's Response to Cornea 101
Cornea and the Burden of Reasonability 101
Rowe on Step 2 of Wykstra's Cornea Critique 104
Wykstra's Argument-Rowe's Version 106
The RST-EST Distinction 108
The Inference from (5) to (6) Re-examined 109
The Prospects for EST 110
Appendix to 'The Prospects for EST' 115
Rowe's Restriction to RST 116
Wykstra's Argument - The Analogical Version 118
Analogical Reasoning 119
Rowe's Critique of Wykstra's Parent Analogy 121
Wykstra's Revised Parent Analogy 122
Rowe's Critique of the New Parent Analogy 124
Further Objections to Rowe's Noseeum Assumption 135
Howard-Snyder's Argument from Complex Goods 135
Durston's Argument from the Complexity of History 138
The Progress Argument 145
Alston's Analogies 154
In Support of the Inference from Inscrutable to Pointless Evil 163
The Argument from Moral Scepticism 163
Rowe's Case in Support of RNA 174
Concluding Remarks 181
The Problem of Divine Hiddenness 189
What is the Problem? 189
Analogies in Support of RNA[subscript 4] 191
The Case Against RNA[subscript 4] 194
The Sceptical Theist Response 194
The Appeal to Human Freedom 197
Hick's Freedom in Relation to God 197
Swinburne's Moral Freedom 206
In Conclusion 216
Meta-Theodicy: Adequacy Conditions for Theodicy 227
The Evils to be Explained 228
The Goods to be Invoked 233
The Nature of Theodical Explanation 238
Summary 242
Theodicy Proper, or Casting Light on the Ways of God: Horrendous Moral Evil 251
Sketch of a Theodicy 251
Problem I: Curtailing the Exercise of Free Will 256
Problem II: Necessary Evils? 261
Tierno's 'Adequacy Argument' Against Free Will Theodicies 261
The Inadequacy of Tierno's 'Adequacy Argument' 263
Conclusion 269
Theodicies for Natural Evil 275
Soul-Making and Natural Evil 276
Swinburne's Free Will Theodicy 279
Reichenbach's Natural Law Theodicy 287
Conclusion 295
The Compatibility of Gratuitous Evil with Theism 303
Van Inwagen's God of Chance 304
Van Inwagen's No Minimum Thesis 309
Taking the Sting Out of the No Minimum Thesis 314
Peterson's Rejection of Meticulous Providence 317
Peterson on the Defensive 318
Peterson on the Offensive 320
Conclusion 324
Conclusion: Is Rowe's Evidential Argument Successful? 333
The 'G.E. Moore Shift' 334
Reconceiving God 337
Rejecting God's Perfect Goodness 337
Rejecting Divine Omnipotence 338
The Worship-Worthiness of God 340
Concluding Remarks 341
Bibliography 347
Index 369
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish ListX
This item is in your CollectionThe God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil
X
This Item is in Your InventoryThe God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil, Why would a loving God who is all-powerful and all-knowing create a world like ours which is marred by all manner of evil, suffering and injustice? This question has come to be known as 'the problem of evil and has troubled both ordinary folk and speciali, The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil, Why would a loving God who is all-powerful and all-knowing create a world like ours which is marred by all manner of evil, suffering and injustice? This question has come to be known as 'the problem of evil and has troubled both ordinary folk and speciali, The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe's Evidential Argument from Evil to your collection on WonderClub |