MicroStation bible Book

Pam's review says "The central question of the novel is whether it is better to live in the safety of a predictable existence which lacks religious belief, or any true art or music, or to have the possibility of creative and spiritual evolution and fulfilment in a world where war, famine and other attrocities are permitted to exist."

If the question is posed like that, the novel is ridiculous. All of the 'good' things listed there could coincide. I dunno if I want to find out if Lawrence really did commit fallacies, or just skip it.