Four Views on Eternal Security Book

This book really cleared up the Classical/Reformed Arminian position for me. I don't know who won; if it had been a real debate, it would have been Ashby or Horton. Harper did a good job representing Wesley, but ultimately wasn't super convincing in his arguments. Geisler was terrible, so many inconsistencies, although I did like how he quoted a lot of scripture. The only disappointment I had was that I wished Horton would have spent a little less time on Covenant Theology. I did enjoy what he said about it, I just think his argument would have had more weight if he had elaborated on his other points more and used more scripture (there are a ton of verses he could have quoted, or at least referenced). Overall, it was a fantastic book and would be helpful for anyone who wanted to better understand the four main views of eternal security.