Essays on actions and events Book

I think I agree with Davidson about a lot, although I'm less certain about other things (do causal statements really have to be nomological deductions?). My main problem with this book - and the reason for its low rating - was mostly the topics. I really don't care about philosophy of language, I don't care about the logical form of action sentences, I don't care about how we talk about events; I care about actions and I care about events. I don't mean to fault Davidson for this; he is a reasonably clear writer (given the age of the essays, at least) and seems to know his stuff. In fact, maybe I should care about what Davidson is talking about. But unfortunately I don't. I probably should have done more research about the topics discussed in this book, but there you go.