Wonder Club world wonders pyramid logo
×

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science Book

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science
Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, <i>Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science</i> contains sixteen original essays by leading authors in the philosophy of science, each one defending the affirmative or negative answer to one of eight specific questions, including: Are there laws of s, Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science has a rating of 2.5 stars
   2 Ratings
X
Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science contains sixteen original essays by leading authors in the philosophy of science, each one defending the affirmative or negative answer to one of eight specific questions, including: Are there laws of s, Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science
2.5 out of 5 stars based on 2 reviews
5
0 %
4
0 %
3
50 %
2
50 %
1
0 %
Digital Copy
PDF format
1 available   for $99.99
Original Magazine
Physical Format

Sold Out

  • Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science
  • Written by author Christopher Hitchcock
  • Published by Wiley-Blackwell, 2003/11/25
  • Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science contains sixteen original essays by leading authors in the philosophy of science, each one defending the affirmative or negative answer to one of eight specific questions, including: Are there laws of s
Buy Digital  USD$99.99

WonderClub View Cart Button

WonderClub Add to Inventory Button
WonderClub Add to Wishlist Button
WonderClub Add to Collection Button

Book Categories

Authors

Notes on Contributors.

Preface.

Introduction: What is the Philosophy of Science?.

Part I: Do Thought Experiments Transcend Empiricism?.

1. Why Thought Experiments Transcend Empiricism: James Robert Brown (University of Toronto).

2. Why Thought Experiments do not Transcend Empiricism: John Norton (University of Pittsburgh).

Part II: Does Probability Capture the Logic of Scientific Confirmation or Justification?.

3. Probability Captures the Logic of Scientific Confirmation: Patrick Maher (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign).

4. Why Probability Does not Capture the Logic of Scientific Justification: Kevin Kelly (Carnegie Mellon University) and Clark Glymour (Carnegie Mellon University).

Part III: Can a Theory's Predictive Success Warrant Belief in the Unobservable Entities it Postulates?.

5. A Theory's Predictive Success Can Warrant Belief in the Unobservable Entities it Postulates: Jarrett Leplin (University of North Carolina, Greensboro).

6. A Theory's Predictive Success Does not Warrant Belief in the Unobservable Entities it Postulates: André Kukla (University of Toronto) and Joel Walmsley (University of Toronto).

Part IV: Are There Laws in the Social Sciences?.

7. There are no Laws in the Social Sciences: John Roberts (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill).

8. There are Laws in the Social Sciences: Harold Kincaid (University of Alabama at Birmingham).

Part V: Are Causes Physically Connected to their Effects?.

9. Causes are Physically Connected to Their Effects: Why Preventers and Omissions are not Causes: Phil Dowe (University of Queensland, Australia).

10. Causes Need Not be Physically Connected to their Effects: The Case for Negative Causation: Jonathan Schaffer (University of Massachusetts, Amherst).

Part VI: Is There a Puzzle about the Low Entropy Past?.

11. On the Origins of the Arrow of Time: Why There is Still a Puzzle About the Low Entropy Past: Huw Price (University of Edinburgh).

12. There is No Puzzle About the Low Entropy Past: Craig Callender.

Part VII: Do Genes Encode Information About Phenotypic Traits:.

13. Genes Encode Information for Phenotypic Traits: Sahotra Sarkar (University of Texas at Austin).

14. Genes Do not Encode Information for Phenotypic Traits: Peter Godfrey-Smith (Stanford University).

Part VIII: Is the Mind a System of Modules Shaped by Natural Selection?.

15. The Mind is a System of Modules Shaped by Natural Selection: Peter Carruthers (University of Maryland).

16. The Mind is Not (Just) a System of Modules Shaped (Just) by Natural Selection: Fiona Cowie (California Institute of Technology) and James Woodward (California Institute of Technology).

Index


Login

  |  

Complaints

  |  

Blog

  |  

Games

  |  

Digital Media

  |  

Souls

  |  

Obituary

  |  

Contact Us

  |  

FAQ

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!!

X
WonderClub Home

This item is in your Wish List

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, <i>Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science</i> contains sixteen original essays by leading authors in the philosophy of science, each one defending the affirmative or negative answer to one of eight specific questions, including: Are there laws of s, Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science

X
WonderClub Home

This item is in your Collection

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, <i>Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science</i> contains sixteen original essays by leading authors in the philosophy of science, each one defending the affirmative or negative answer to one of eight specific questions, including: Are there laws of s, Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science

X
WonderClub Home

This Item is in Your Inventory

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science, <i>Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science</i> contains sixteen original essays by leading authors in the philosophy of science, each one defending the affirmative or negative answer to one of eight specific questions, including: Are there laws of s, Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science

Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science

WonderClub Home

You must be logged in to review the products

E-mail address:

Password: