|
|
Sold Out
Book Categories |
Foreword James V. Schall 9
Author's Preface to the English Edition 15
Leisure The Basis Of Culture
I Leisure the foundation of Western culture
"We are 'unleisurely' in order to have leisure"
Aristotle
The claims of the world of "total work" 19
II "Intellectual work" and "intellectual worker"
Discursive thought and "intellectual contemplation"
Kant and the Romantics
Ratio and Intellectus: the medieval conception of knowledge
Contemplation "superhuman"
Knowledge as "work": the two aspects of this conception
"Unqualified activity"
Effort and effortlessness
Hard work is what is good
Antisthenes
Thomas Aquinas: "it is not the difficulty which is the decisive point"
Contemplation and play
Willingness to suffer
First comes the "gift"
"Intellectual work" as a social function 25
III Sloth (acedia) and the incapacity to leisure
Leisure as non-activity
Leisure as a festive attitude
Leisure and rest from work
Leisure above all functions
Leisure as a means of rising above the "really human" 43
IV The influence of the ideal of leisure- "Humanism" an inadequate position?
Excursus on "proletariat"
The philosopher and the common working man
Man "fettered to work"
Lack of property, State compulsion and inner impoverishment as the causes
"Proletarians" not limited to the proletariat
artes liberates and artes serviles
Proudhon on Sunday
"Deprole-tarianization" and the opening of the realm of leisure 53
V Leisure made inwardly possible through Divine Worship
Feast and worship
Unused time and space
The world of work and the Feast day
Leisure divorced from worship becomes idleness
The significance of Divine worship65
The Philosophical Act
I By philosophizing we step beyond the world of work
"Common need" and "common good"
The "world of total work" rests on the identification of "common need" and "common good"
The situation of philosophy in the "world of work"
The relation between religious acts and aesthetic acts, between philosophizing and the experience of love or death
Sham forms of these basic attitudes in life
The everlasting misunderstanding between philosophy and the everyday world of work: The Thracian Maid and a figure in the Platonic dialogues (Appollodorus). The positive aspect of their incommensurability: the freedom of philosophy (its unusableness)
The knowledge of the functionary and the knowledge of a gentleman
The sciences "unfiree"
Philosophy free, its theoretical character
The presupposition of theoria
The belief that man's real wealth consists neither in the satisfaction of his needs, nor in the control of nature 77
II Where does the philosophical act carry us when it transcends the "world of work"?
The world as a field of relations
The hierarchie gradations of the world
The notion "surroundings" (v. Uexküll)
Spirit as the power of apprehending the world; spirit exists within the whole of reality
Being as related to spirit: the truth of things
The gradations of inwardness: the relation to the totality of being and personality
The world of spirit: the totality of things and the essence of things
Man not a pure spirit
Man's field of relations: both world and environment, both together
Philosophizing as a step beyond our environment vis-à-vis de Vunivers
The step as "superhuman"
The distinguishing mark, of a philosophical question: it is on the horizon of the whole of reality 93
III "World" and "environment" are not watertight compartments
The world preserved in the environment: wonder
The "un-bourgeois" character of philosophical wonder
The danger of being uprooted from the workaday world
Wonder as "the confusion of thought at itself"
The inner direction of wonder not aimed at doubt but at the sense of mystery
Wonder as the moving principle of philosophy
The structure of hope and the structure of wonder similar
The special sciences cease "wondering", philosophy does not
Philosophia as the loving search for wisdom as it is possessed by God
The inner impossibility of a "closed" system of philosophy
Philosophizing as the completion of man's existence 109
IV Philosophy always preceded by a traditional interpretation of the world
Plato, Aristotle and the pre-socratics in their relation to tradition
Plato tradition as revelation
Its freedom vis-à-vis theology one of the^ marks of Plato's philosophizing
Christian theology the form of pre-philosophic tradition to be found in the West
The vitality of philosophy dependent upon its relation to theology
Is a non-Christian philosophy possible?
Christian philosophy not characterized by its ready answers but by its pro-founder apprehension of the mysterious nature of the world
Christian philosophy not intellectually simpler
The joy which goes with not being able to understand utterly and completely
Christianity not, in the first place, doctrine but reality
The real soil of Christian philosophizing
the living experience of Christianity as reality 127
| Price | Condition | Delivery | Seller | Action |
| $99.99 | Digital |
| WonderClub |
Jerry Hseih
reviewed Leisure: The Basis of Culture on June 18, 2018
Leisure: The Basis of Culture
To do philosophy is to realize the naturally essential inclination of the human mind toward totality.
I often wonder why is Achilles always resting in The Iliad; at one point it almost feels like he is angry not with Agamemnon taking the slave girl but with Agamemnon denying his right to leisure. Josef Pieper gives leisure an interesting definition: "Leisure is the disposition of receptive understanding, of contemplative beholding, and immersion in the real." In other words, leisure is what prompts the non-active, purely receptive part of human knowing which transcends human laboring and gives births to what constitutes the "truly human". This definition does fit into what I understand as essentially Achilles: the involuntariness of his action and the harmony of his anger with the totality of nature. Achilles, emblematic of the aristocratic as opposed to the democratic or proletarian, denies the totalitarian claim of the world of work which is also the claim of Agamemnon.
Of course, Pieper's world (not to mention today's world) differs from Homer's. There are Plato, Jesus, Kant, Marx in between, and Pieper analyzes their impacts on the conception of leisure and work. This book is mostly a critique of what the totalitarian claim of work is doing to philosophy. Pieper argues that philosophers (or maybe everyone of us humans) should not see themselves as workers or social functionaries. "That which has its meaning and purpose in itself, that which is itself purpose, cannot be made the means for some other purpose, just as someone can not love a person 'for such and such' or 'in order to do such and such'!" When Karl Marx changes the essence of philosophy from interpreting the world to changing the world, he reduces philosophy to "intellectual work" with a certain social function, and denies philosophy its essential totality.
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish List
X
This item is in your Collection
Leisure: The Basis of Culture
X
This Item is in Your Inventory
Leisure: The Basis of Culture
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add Leisure: The Basis of Culture, One of the most important philosophy titles published in the twentieth century, Josef Pieper's Leisure, the Basis of Culture is more significant, even more crucial, today than it was when it first appeared more than fifty years ago. This edition also, Leisure: The Basis of Culture to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Leisure: The Basis of Culture, One of the most important philosophy titles published in the twentieth century, Josef Pieper's Leisure, the Basis of Culture is more significant, even more crucial, today than it was when it first appeared more than fifty years ago. This edition also, Leisure: The Basis of Culture to your collection on WonderClub |
