Wonder Club world wonders pyramid logo
×

Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy Book

Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy
Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy, Should the United States use retaliatory threats to open foreign markets or deter unfair trading practices? This study reexamines the arguments for and against reciprocity and retaliatory threats in light of actual experience since early 1975, especially , Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy has a rating of 3 stars
   2 Ratings
X
Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy, Should the United States use retaliatory threats to open foreign markets or deter unfair trading practices? This study reexamines the arguments for and against reciprocity and retaliatory threats in light of actual experience since early 1975, especially , Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy
3 out of 5 stars based on 2 reviews
5
0 %
4
0 %
3
100 %
2
0 %
1
0 %
Digital Copy
PDF format
1 available   for $99.99
Original Magazine
Physical Format

Sold Out

  • Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy
  • Written by author Amelia Porges and Charles Iceland
  • Published by Washington, DC : Institute for International Economics, 1994., 1994/11/21
  • Should the United States use retaliatory threats to open foreign markets or deter unfair trading practices? This study reexamines the arguments for and against reciprocity and retaliatory threats in light of actual experience since early 1975, especially
Buy Digital  USD$99.99

WonderClub View Cart Button

WonderClub Add to Inventory Button
WonderClub Add to Wishlist Button
WonderClub Add to Collection Button

Book Categories

Authors

Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction 1
Pt. I Section 301 as a Tool of Aggressive Unilateralism
1 US Trade Pressures and Policy in the 1980s 9
2 Making 301 "Super" 23
3 Truth and Consequences 51
4 When and How Does Section 301 Open Markets? 79
Pt. II Case Studies of Aggressive Unilateralism
5 Super 301: Japan 101
6 Super 301: Brazil and India 149
7 Super 301: Korea and Taiwan 171
8 Brazil: Intellectual Property Protection for Pharmaceuticals 187
9 European Union: Oilseeds 209
10 Japan: Beef and Citrus 233
11 Japan and the European Community: Financial Services 267
Pt. III Conclusions and Recommendations
12 Super 301: A Two-Edged Sword 313
13 Toward Aggressive Multilateralism 329
Appendix: Section 301 Table and Case Summaries
References 467
Index 481
List of Tables [sn]


Login

  |  

Complaints

  |  

Blog

  |  

Games

  |  

Digital Media

  |  

Souls

  |  

Obituary

  |  

Contact Us

  |  

FAQ

CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!!

X
WonderClub Home

This item is in your Wish List

Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy, Should the United States use retaliatory threats to open foreign markets or deter unfair trading practices? This study reexamines the arguments for and against reciprocity and retaliatory threats in light of actual experience since early 1975, especially , Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy

X
WonderClub Home

This item is in your Collection

Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy, Should the United States use retaliatory threats to open foreign markets or deter unfair trading practices? This study reexamines the arguments for and against reciprocity and retaliatory threats in light of actual experience since early 1975, especially , Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy

Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy

X
WonderClub Home

This Item is in Your Inventory

Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy, Should the United States use retaliatory threats to open foreign markets or deter unfair trading practices? This study reexamines the arguments for and against reciprocity and retaliatory threats in light of actual experience since early 1975, especially , Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy

Reciprocity and retaliation in U. S. trade policy

WonderClub Home

You must be logged in to review the products

E-mail address:

Password: