Where the Wild Books Are: A Field Guide to Ecofiction Book

+++ A literary survey of ecofiction? Sure, I'm interested. But...
--- Over-reaching definition makes the findings both too many and not too interesting.
--- Very curious treatment of authorship by gender, but not (much) by other traits protected by law or known as under-represented in the writing industry in general. Good for feminists, some could say, but there is no winner when many are forgotten.
--- Curious selection of books such as The Man in the High Castle, The Metamorphosis, and others that have at best a little overlap with ecology, and surely not by design from the author.
--- Very poor coverage of international literature. On the one hand, Japan gets a very shallow treatment, with ecological masterpieces such as Hayao Miyazaki's manga and related myriad of options dismissed. On the other hand, Romania's writers under Communism present indeed a version of pastoral life, but Marin Preda's Moromeții is about the personal turmoil caused by rapid industrialization and not about ecology, of human suffering rather than its relationship with nature, although there is some sprinkling of how nature is affected.
+/--- I did find a few interesting names, but the book was not more helpful than simply browsing Wikipedia for the topic. This is because the presentation consists of long lists of names, of authors and of books, interspersed with very brief descriptions of some of the items (selected for obscure criteria).