Sold Out
Book Categories |
List of maps | ||
Acknowledgments | ||
Introduction | 3 | |
Pt. I | Winters v. United States: Litigation, Decisions, and Context | 15 |
Ch. 1 | Prelude to the Winters Litigation: Land Cession and Reservation Agreements, Non-Indian Settlement, and Irrigation | 17 |
Ch. 2 | Legal Context of the Litigation: The Prior Appropriation System and Possibilities in the Law of Water in Montana in 1905 | 35 |
Ch. 3 | Commencement of the Winters Case: A Federal Court Decision for Fort Belknap and Its Place in the Water Issues of the Milk River Valley | 67 |
Ch. 4 | Winters in the Federal Court of Appeals: Reclamation Anxiety, Kansas v. Colorado, and Affirmation by the Court of Appeals | 85 |
Ch. 5 | Back in the Milk River Valley, 1905-1907: Reclamation, Reservation Busting, and Sugar Beet Production | 103 |
Ch. 6 | Winters and Allotment: The Blackfeet Reservation Allotment Legislation and Water Rights | 119 |
Ch. 7 | The Supreme Court's Decision in Winters: Anticlimax in the Milk River Valley, 1907-1908 | 142 |
Ch. 8 | The People of Winters and the Natural Law of the West | 158 |
Pt. II | The Work of Winters, 1905-1930s: A Case Study from the Uintah Reservation | 165 |
Ch. 9 | Prelude to the Water Rights Litigation at the Uintah Indian Reservation, Late 1800s to 1914: Allotment, Irrigation, State Water Law, and Water Problems | 169 |
Ch. 10 | National Context of the Uintah Litigation: Growing Interest in the Potential of Winters, 1909-1915 | 181 |
Ch. 11 | Back at the Uintah Reservation: The Switch to a Winters-Based Approach and Litigation | 223 |
Ch. 12 | Lessons from the Uintah Reservation Litigation | 246 |
Conclusion | 251 | |
Notes | 253 | |
Bibliography | 311 | |
Index | 325 |
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish ListX
This item is in your CollectionIndian Reserved Water Rights: The Winters Doctrine in Its Social and Legal Context, 1880s-1930s, Vol. 8
X
This Item is in Your InventoryIndian Reserved Water Rights: The Winters Doctrine in Its Social and Legal Context, 1880s-1930s, Vol. 8
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add Indian Reserved Water Rights: The Winters Doctrine in Its Social and Legal Context, 1880s-1930s, Vol. 8, In its 1908 decision for Winters v. United States, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower-court ruling that the United States and the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Indians had reserved rights to water in the Milk River through an 1888 treaty which created the F, Indian Reserved Water Rights: The Winters Doctrine in Its Social and Legal Context, 1880s-1930s, Vol. 8 to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Indian Reserved Water Rights: The Winters Doctrine in Its Social and Legal Context, 1880s-1930s, Vol. 8, In its 1908 decision for Winters v. United States, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower-court ruling that the United States and the Gros Ventre and Assiniboine Indians had reserved rights to water in the Milk River through an 1888 treaty which created the F, Indian Reserved Water Rights: The Winters Doctrine in Its Social and Legal Context, 1880s-1930s, Vol. 8 to your collection on WonderClub |