Peter Strawson Book

📖
.
Baudrillard is somewhat of a master of spewing spectacles which, whilst sounding fanciful and thought-through, are actually at their root core abstract from the common sensical and rather silly. This extended interview consists of an interviewer pushing Baudrillard around his little box of vocabulary to the point that he runs out of reserved and rehearsed sophistries and has to resort to speaking in his own tongue which, sadly, is underwhelming and, quite frankly, sterile. I'm a lover of complex prose, but I found this interview to be fanciful for fanciful's sake, a somewhat contrived, pseudo-philosophical discussion which seemed not fully endorsed by the speaker, resulting in a flimsy and uninspiring dialectic. Nevertheless it was enjoyable to read: mainly for the challenge of unveiling the silliness of it all.