Sold Out
Book Categories |
Acknowledgments ix
Introduction 1
Part I Terrorism: What's in a Name? 9
1 The problem of defining terrorism 11
2 Defining terrorism 24
3 What makes terrorism wrong? 30
4 Innocence and discrimination 40
5 "Who dun it" definitions of terrorism 59
Conclusion: taking stock 73
Part II Why Moral Condemnations of Terrorism Lack Credibility 75
Introduction: toward morally credible condemnations of terrorism 77
6 Why standard theories fail to condemn terrorism 79
7 Just war theory and the problem of collateral damage 94
Conclusion: categorical vs. conditional criticisms of terrorism 104
Part III Defending Noncombatant Immunity 107
Introduction: the ethics of war-fighting: a spectrum of possible views 109
8 The realist challenge to the ethics of war 114
9 An ethic of war for reasonable realists 125
10 Walzer on noncombatant immunity as a human right 133
11 The supreme emergency exception 146
12 Rights theories, utilitarianism, and the killing of civilians 160
13 Immunity rights vs. the right of self-defense 175
14 A rule-utilitarian defense of noncombatant immunity 191
15 Why utilitarian criticisms of noncombatant immunity are mistaken 212
16 Is noncombatant immunity a "mere" convention? 229
Part IV How Much Immunity should Noncombatants Have? 247
Introduction: the problem of collateral damage 249
17 The problem of collateral damage killings 251
18 The ethics of collateral damage killings 269
Conclusion: terrorism and the ethics of war 288
Bibliography 303
Index 314
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish ListX
This item is in your CollectionTerrorism and the Ethics of War
X
This Item is in Your InventoryTerrorism and the Ethics of War
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add Terrorism and the Ethics of War, Most people strongly condemn terrorism; yet they often fail to say how terrorist acts differ from other acts of violence such as the killing of civilians in war. Stephen Nathanson argues that we cannot have morally credible views about terrorism if we foc, Terrorism and the Ethics of War to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Terrorism and the Ethics of War, Most people strongly condemn terrorism; yet they often fail to say how terrorist acts differ from other acts of violence such as the killing of civilians in war. Stephen Nathanson argues that we cannot have morally credible views about terrorism if we foc, Terrorism and the Ethics of War to your collection on WonderClub |