Le Franglais Book

I wanted to like this more than I did. The portraits of the ancient past, revealed in archaeological finds, was fascinating(I'm not up on my prehistoric eras, but I could still follow his lead). The linkages the author develops between their lost worlds and ours made our ancestors seem not quite so foreign--one of the objectives of the book being "the search for antecedents." How remarkable the prosthetic ear, made from a shell, attached by surgery to a skull in Neolithic (3rd millenium B.C.E.)! My favorite chapter was the last one, on Roman aqueducts, perhaps because the "evidence" is more conspicuous and so clearly parallels contemporary issues with water and "rights" and the public good. Also, maybe the author wasn't jumping to his own rapturous conclusions about these "vestiges": I was often stymied and a little aggravated when the author would say (or imply) "we can only conclude...." I would think, "That's the ONLY possibility?" Was he omitting other information--with which other experts but not casual readers like me might be familiar--that grounded his assumptions about the nature of the ancient cultures? Or else, was he overlooking some other possibilities that could arise? It seemed to me there were a lot of alternatives for, for instance, the significance of or motivation for certain burial practices he described. Anyway, I did finish the book, learned from it, and admired Sobin's lyrical intelligence despite some frustrations with it.