Toward a Science of Consciousness II The Second Tucson Discussions and Debates Book

Right after I was suggested to read this book, I had a social science dream very similar to what I was experiencing at the university. It's difficult to quantify this field.
(It's a shame I don't recall the specific name of the professor who taught PSC200! I use that textbook to better understand trends in society. Some lady... The WCU website does not help. Perhaps that's deliberate - you have to ask around campus? Я не снаю... at least I don't know for sure. That's something I'd be interested to study in the future! Quantifiers по-русски! I don't know how to get there yet but I think I could eventually!)

I am determined! You know, actually? That's really strange! When I was younger, I did a lot of learning Russian when I was semi-conscious, almost asleep. I was practically in a dreaming state. So that is why I am thinking of that beautiful language specifically when I think of this book. The book itself talks mostly about REM stuff, you know, the whole nine yards, all the stuff which you've already researched online. I liked its graphs and pictures: particularly the one on p60 which identified how EEGs tend to go. Having had two or three which I remember, I can safely say mine looked like none of those three. Then again, I was never strictly asleep when I was having an EEG taken, and the three graphs are of calm people sleeping - also, my mind is more unique than New York.

The REM for nightmares is much more like what my graph resembled, unfortunately. How peculiar. I have a lot of terrors when I'm asleep, so that's why I don't like to sleep.

So, if you want to learn about this stuff too, pick this book up! Interesno material.