Sold Out
Book Categories |
Preface and Acknowledgments ix
List of Abbreviations xix
The Stereotypical Picture of the Russell/Bradley Dispute 1
The protagonists 1
Locating the dispute 3
The stereotypical picture outlined 4
The sources and pervasiveness of the stereotype 6
Displacing the stereotype 18
Finding a Way into Bradley's Metaphysics 21
Preliminary sketch 21
The foundations of Bradley's thought 24
Intellectual satisfaction 26
Ideal experiment 27
The sceptical principle, mark I 33
The attack on predication 37
The attack on external relations 39
The sceptical principle, marks II and III 40
The attack on internal relations 42
To monism and idealism 44
Contingency, sufficient reason and circularity 46
Judgment 49
Introduction 49
An initial contrast between Bradley and Russell on judgment 50
Russell's 1903 binary relation theory of judgment 53
The origins of the multiple relation theory of judgment 58
The 1910 version 62
The 1912 version 67
The 1913 version 69
The 1918 non-theory 73
Subsequent developments 75
Truth 78
Introduction 78
Bradley and the coherence theory of truth 79
Bradley on coherence and correspondence 81
Russell and the correspondence theory of truth 85
The derivation of Bradley's metaphysical theory of truth 89
The nature of Bradley's metaphysical theory of truth 93
The availability of the identity theory of truth 97
Russell and the identity theory of truth 100
Russell, the multiple relation theory, and correspondence 103
Grammar and Ontology 106
The transparency thesis, the theory of descriptions, and the usual story 106
The consequences of replacing the usual story 111
Grammar, descriptions and analysis 115
Negative propositions 120
Universal propositions 124
Subject-predicate grammar and the status of relations 128
Subject-predicate grammar: substance and attribute 136
Coda 140
Relations 141
The significance of relations 141
Logic, metaphysics and internal relations 145
Interpreting the doctrine of internal relations 150
The development of Bradley's views on relations 155
Russell, internality and unreality 163
Bradley's arguments for the unreality of relations and their terms 167
Decline and Fall 174
Health warning 174
The decline of monistic idealism 174
Conclusion 184
Notes 189
Bibliography 215
Bibliographical Note 225
Index 227
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish ListX
This item is in your CollectionThe Russell/Bradley Dispute And Its Significance For Twentieth-Century Philosophy
X
This Item is in Your InventoryThe Russell/Bradley Dispute And Its Significance For Twentieth-Century Philosophy
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add The Russell/Bradley Dispute And Its Significance For Twentieth-Century Philosophy, In the early twentieth century an apparently obscure philosophical debate took place between F. H. Bradley and Bertrand Russell. The historical outcome was momentous: the demise of the movement known as British Idealism, and its eventual replacement by th, The Russell/Bradley Dispute And Its Significance For Twentieth-Century Philosophy to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add The Russell/Bradley Dispute And Its Significance For Twentieth-Century Philosophy, In the early twentieth century an apparently obscure philosophical debate took place between F. H. Bradley and Bertrand Russell. The historical outcome was momentous: the demise of the movement known as British Idealism, and its eventual replacement by th, The Russell/Bradley Dispute And Its Significance For Twentieth-Century Philosophy to your collection on WonderClub |