God According to God: A Physicist Proves We've Been Wrong about God All Along Book

I'm going to write my review as I read;
1- In chapter "one" of his book the author talked about how a communist Russia made terrible things to its own people while their leaders and the party discarded God. I understood from what he wrote that they became atheists so they did bad things to humanity because they've no morality or no guidance for what is right and what is wrong!. Well, What about Hitler and the Nazis they had the cross right on their flag and yet when we speak of the world war II we only think of the Nazis and what they did not only to their people but to the whole Europe and what about Italy and the Fascist were they also Atheists.
It's a weak point to be used in his book, very weak!!
------------------------------------
2- chapter 2: he repeated again the typing monkeys thing trying to show that the the probability that by chance life or the universe could come into existence is very small! Of course it is who can argue the smallness of the probability of monkeys randomly producing one of Shakespeare's sonnets?!. Dawkins in his book "the blind watchmaker" introduced another thought experiment in which randomness coupled with selection could render the process possible.
On page37: he stated a proverb; "the song a sparrow learns in his youth is its song for life'. Thank you for pointing out that the programming the human is subjected yo in his early age might control the way he thinks about issues for the rest of his life and there's indeed the 'illusion of truth' which states that repetition of things might lead to the belief that it's the truth. But then he went on saying that and so we all learnt that Darwin is right!!!, what?!!!!!!. Is he out of his mind or what? We all learnt creationism in schools and homes from teachers and parents and took religious classes in schools but never heard of evolution unless in a small paragraph in a book from a disbelieving-in-evolution teacher!!.
--------------------------------------
3- In chapter 3 the author introduced the marvels of our universe and the conditioned suitable for life which are met in out very planet and not every where else!. I have nothing against that, I don't deny that for life to exist on its current form certain conditions must be met to originate and sustain life but why jump to a conclusion rather than considering all possibilities?!. I can say that the author here stated what is know as the "Goldilocks" which serves the idea that the conditions that helped life to flourish must have been finely tuned "be design". The idea of a God is an old one even among old tribes and the history of mythology in all races speaks for itself, here I'd ask the author where did you get your idea of "an intelligent designer"? did you come up with it out of your inquiries or was it in there the whole time since your very moments in your life?!. I thing for one to jump to the conclusion of a designer is subjected to the "Illusion of truth Principle" where the repetition of something makes one believe it's true as such for every one born to religious parents must have been programmed since his very first moments and ordained in faith such that when became older and think he'd just search for what supports the religious claims unaware that he started his inquiry not empty handed ready for whatever results that might come up but he started already with an answer at the back of his head. The main complexity in my opinion to the idea of a designer is "Causality" for it's only derived from the observation of how things in our own universe act, so to apply it to relation between elements in our universe including us is not a problem but to try to extrapolate it so as to derive the existence of the universe as a whole from something else that needs a proof which I have never come across one till this very moment!!!.

Then he stated the properties of our universe and especially the earth and how that is "tuned" to nurture life!!. we're here and life as a whole exists because of the properties that can be seen around us but claiming that these are the only conditions that need to be met for life and without it no life would have existed, that claim needs a proof!. Life would have taken a different path should any of these conditions became different!.
finally he stated that we're living indeed in a very special planet designed for life and mocked Carl Sagan for saying that our planet is only ordinary and after all of that he stated the probability of a star meeting 18 conditions for life and end up with a number of 10,000 earth like planets meeting exactly the same conditions as our own planet!!!. Then it's indeed an ordinary planet and I can't understand how he contradicted him self in such a way!!!.
-----------------------------------------
4- Chapter 4. one thing is to be said in here, the author believes that Adam and Eve lived on earth 2448 years before the revelation on mount Sinai. no comment!>
-----------------------------------------
After that the book transforms into a religious book talking about what is in the Bible and about God relationships with his creation and his prophets, etc.


The book is not to be considered as one to be used for debates concerning God's existence and proving it through science, it's absolutely not that kind of books. It's much like a book for religious people to renew their faith, much like a religious explanatory book but from a scientist rather than a cleric!!.