Renaissance Text: Theory, Editing and Textuality Book

I found Jowett's ability to describe conflicting viewpoints very refreshing. My experience of textual criticism so far has been primarily of highly dogmatic people insisting (even if they're postmodernists and theoretically against such black-and-white thinking) that all textual scholarship not in accord with their own is ignorant, misguided, and deeply harmful to the unsuspecting reader at the other end of the edition. Jowett obviously has his own biases and advocates his own opinions, but he is capable of presenting both sides of the question fairly and admitting that the truth is ultimately unknowable. We are highly unlikely, after all, ever to find a Shakespeare manuscript, so any prevailing theory is really just speculation.