Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater, with Some Thoughts on Muses (Especially Helga Testorf), Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Housewives, Makeup Artists, Geishas, Valkyries and Venus Figu Book

Understatement isn't exactly characteristic of William T. Vollmann's writing. In his previous journalistic attempts to understand some of the more paradoxical and confusing aspects of the world, he has exercised such an unremitting onslaught of literary hyperbole as to make it his stylistic M.O. His writing seems to exhaust the meaning of exploration. To his credit, this is also what makes his writing approach so inimitable. Rising Up, Rising Down is the most immediate example that comes to mind

Understatement isn\'t exactly characteristic of William T. Vollmann\'s writing. In his previous journalistic attempts to understand some of the more paradoxical and confusing aspects of the world, he has exercised such an unremitting onslaught of literary hyperbole as to make it his stylistic M.O. His writing seems to exhaust the meaning of exploration. To his credit, this is also what makes his writing approach so inimitable. Rising Up, Rising Down is the most immediate example that comes to mind; a 3,600 page meditation on the meaning of violence. In so many ways, it comes as no surprise that the subject for his latest non-fiction piece is the most notoriously ambiguous artistic tradition. Since the late 19th century, westerners have been simultaneously moved and confounded by Japanese Noh Theater. Ulysses S. Grant, after seeing his first Noh Play in 1879, was so moved by its subtle grace that he subsequently urged for the preservation of Noh theater. And Ernest Fennolosa, an Italian scholar of Japanese, went to great lengths to explain the technical aspects of Noh, and to introduce some of Zeami\'s famous plays to western audiences. Yet the amount of actual writings on Noh is scarce. With the exception of a few brief introductions to edited collections of classic plays (the Noh repertoire contains 250 different titles) there isn\'t exactly a definitive book on Noh in English. As Vollmann opines in the introduction of the book \"Deaf, dumb and illiterate in Japanese, innocent of formal study in any discipline of art, a graceless dancer afflicted with bad eyesight, I may not be the perfect author for any essay on Noh drama.\" Maybe not, but as is the case with most of Vollmann\'s oeuvre, his epistemology creates so much neurosis about understanding anything outside of his own personal experience, that he is always more than willing to admit that he can\'t possibly understand the subject matter at hand, regardless of how much research he does, or how many interviews he conducts. Though this is also a trademark point of motivation for his books. This endless curiosity seems to prevent satisfaction with his own cultural ignorance. And herein lies a sort of explanation as to why his books tend to be so very long and, according to some critics, overwritten. It\'s because, as a journalist, Vollmann is not content with assumption, or over-confident assessment. He\'ll never truly understand poverty, the border politics of Imperial County, prostitutes, or the Soviet Army, but his books are a way of sharing this attempt to understand and connect to some other part of the world. Still, most readers, even those familiar with Vollmann\'s work, might be inclined to ask \"Why Noh Theater?\". In the case of Kissing the Mask, Noh Theater is important because it\'s a cultural conduit through which he can channel the essence of feminine beauty. And throughout the book we follow Vollmann\'s quest to understand a little more about what it means to be a woman.

Of course, a majority of this book is specifically about Japanese Noh Theater. It\'s the cultural stepping stone for Vollmann\'s foray into the nature of feminine beauty. He traveled all throughout the island of Japan for the book, seeing most of the plays in either Kyoto or Tokyo. As always, a translator accompanied him for his interviews with various mask-makers and actors. The book begins - as does Fennolosa\'s The Classic Noh Theater of Japan, a collection of plays (mostly his notes completed by Ezra Pound) - with a brief overview of the roles of the actors, the musicians and their instruments, the stage schematics, and the relevance of the mask. There is a pretty detailed sketch of the idea of Noh Theater and how it functions formally, as the best approach to this subject for a western writer would be to begin with an elaborate description of the technical aspects of a Noh play. This is undoubtedly the most focused section of Kissing the Mask because Vollmann avoids digression at this point, trying to give the reader a coherent idea of the visual experience of a Noh play. A common criticism of his writing has been that he often assumes that the reader doesn\'t require too many explanations of the subject at hand. This may also be because he feels equally lost on this particular subject, maybe with the hope that he\'s describing it to the reader as he learns about it. He focuses on actor Umewaka Rikoru, grandson of the famous Umewaka Minoru (a Noh actor who did plays during the last days of the Shogunate, and continued acting up through the Meiji restoration period, which was a considerably difficult time for Noh actors as they lost their means of acting as a feudal lord\'s retainer). Many of the questions posed to Mr. Umewaka concern the emotional and psychological preparation of a Noh actor, most importantly, that most Noh actors strive to feel nothing on stage. As Rikoru\'s grandfather studied under Zeami, one of the first Noh play writers, as well as the most well known theoretician of the art form, Vollmann utilizes his writings on Noh as a philosophical crutch, and a helpful explanatory guide, assisting the reader through a comprehensive explanation of the underlying religious and philosophical connotations of a typical Noh play. Zeami’s theoretical writings are important to Vollmann’s understanding of Noh in that they offer insight into what is being conveyed through a majority of the plays, not simply through allusive physical gesture and stage props, such as the fan and the mask, but through the symbolic suggestiveness of the plays themselves. There is an emphasis on the concept of “the flower”, which implies the beauty of a Noh performance, as Zeami states in his Fushikaden: (Teachings on the Style and the Flower). The flower as a metaphorical concept, represents a sense of beauty that is never immediately apparent. Therefore, with a Noh actor, as with a San Francisco street prostitute, the beauty behind the flower and the mask is veiled in a superficial aesthetic; an image or representation of beauty intended to create an illusion. The actor or beauty implies grace through their own soulfulness of movement and expression. The flower of beauty is an idea that compels someone like Vollmann to endlessly probe for information or knowledge that might aid in the penetration of the mask. Is enough knowledge or research the best way to understand or obtain this beauty? This is one of the more profound questions that his book has to offer. After this rough explanation of Noh Theater, and the mysterious nature of this artistic tradition, Vollmann delves deeper into various other manifestations of female beauty in the world that might help him adequately understand what it is that defines femininity.

And so Kissing the Mask is imbued with allusions and analysis of various examples from Japanese culture. Just as much as Noh theater is essential to Vollmann’s understanding of feminine beauty, so is Lady Muraskai’s the Tale of Genji, Kawabata’s Snow Country, Geishas, Kabuki Theater, the Norse Sagas, Andrew Wyeth’s Helga Testorf drawings, Mishima’s obstinate attachment to youthful beauty, transgender women, and porn actresses. Many Noh plays, such as Kayoi Komachi (Komachi and the Hundred Nights), focus on the transient nature of existence, the disintegration of the body, and the futility of attachment to the passage of time; a mortal obsession which occupies much of the second half of the book. And this theme is to be found to some relative degree in all the aforementioned cultural and artistic examples. These are digressions, at times successful, at other times, seemingly inconsequential, that help to illuminate the initial concerns of representational beauty in Noh Theater. To summarize the importance of every cultural digression on beauty would be tiresome. What’s important is that each example emphasizes some artistic or social version of attachment to beauty. These meditations and digressions make Kissing the Mask unfocused in ways, yet help illuminate Vollmann’s central theoretical concern in others. This middle portion of the book almost caves in a way. Some readers, already struggling to keep up with the information on Noh, may feel bogged down by such an overwhelming display of cultural allusion. The intention is always clear though, and each chapter offers hours of contemplative thought. One of the intellectual consolations of the book is the thought provoking aspect of each and every one of these artistic examples of veiled beauty, how the various examples connect, and most importantly, how each one might relate to feminine beauty and the art of understatement.

In chapter 16, entitled They Just Want to Look in the Mirror: Yukiko Makes Me Over, Vollmann gets a Geisha makeover by Yukiko, a famous Japanese make-up artist. It’s a particularly entertaining section, and a moment of the trademark self-insertion of Vollmann into his subject matter, that he is so well known for. Now he can look into the mirror to truly ponder what a woman is, more importantly, in what way it is possible to create the illusion of feminine beauty. For, as he states in the fourth chapter with the help of some of Mr. Umewaka’s thoughts on the illusion of beauty in Noh, “… one of the many astonishing achievements of Noh is when a dumpy old man becomes a lovely young girl, all the while showing his swollen feet in the white tabi socks and working his Adam’s apple as he sings in his old man’s bass. No matter what his body is, the young girl lives in him! He possesses the true flower.” So then, if the flower blooms by maintaining secrecy, is the mask of feminine beauty always an illusion? He attempts to find out by putting himself behind the mask of the Geisha. There is a beauty to this display of curiosity about beauty, in and of itself. And reading Vollmann muse on the seemingly feminine image in the mirror in front of him (not to mention being able to view the pictures that he takes of himself) is one of the most moving passages of the book.

Readers less interested in exploring some of the more classic Noh plays and artistic allusions in Kissing the Mask, will be more interested in the case of Mishima Yukio, the infamous Japanese novelist who committed Seppuku in 1970, supposedly motivated by an attempted coup d\'etat, and wrote modern versions of some of the famous plays of Zeami. Mishima was a writer, notorious for several theatrical personas, which were all part of a lifetime attempt to create an artistic legacy out of aesthetic contrivances. As Paul Schrader has suggested, in his film Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters, Mishima\'s obsession with the essentially transient beauty of youth prevented him from being capable of dying honorably, in full acceptance of the lamentable process of aging. Even though his famous ritual suicide is often associated with what is typically considered an honorable death. As Donald Richie states so calmly in his Japan Journals, \"The theatricality of this sort of death, as melodramatic as the plots of any of Mishima\'s plays, was a necessary piece in the life so spectacularly terminated. That is what I thought of when I learned of Mishima\'s suicide. There was no surprise.\" Early on, in his description of the beauty of feminine allusiveness, and an aspect of Noh Theater that makes its own ambiguity so astounding, Vollmann comments on its ability to surprise the spectator with the symbolical nuances of beauty that are never immediately apparent. Mishima, in his rebellion, not only against his own self-hatred, but against the accepting nature of the transience of beauty and young age that the tradition of Noh Theater embodies, lets his characters pursue their vain obsessions to a delusional degree. His example might as well blend into the miasma of cultural allusion that Vollmann has to offer, but it should also stand out as a sort of moral allegory within this text. Mishima\'s attachment decries the Shintoesque calmness and acceptance of death and aging that all Noh plays attempt to convey. To be more precise, concerning this particular book; the lesson that Vollmann aims to instruct most of his readers on through the example of his own stubbornness, is that the attachment to an understanding of beauty is analogous to madness and confusion. It will not show us the true nature of beauty. Rather it will put us at war with its essence. Hence, the case of Mishima Yukio, and the vain futility of attachment.

What is feminine beauty? What is Grace? What is Poverty? What is Violence? To approach any of these questions with the assumption that enough knowledge and self-education can assist one in coming to a satisfying conclusion is a fallacy. So why should the average reader invest the time that it takes to read four-hundred or more pages full of ponderous meditations? It\'s because insatiable curiosity informs our motives for reading books in the first place. This intellectual desire to come to a conclusion, or wrap up a complicated question is wholly absent from Vollmann\'s treatise on beauty, as it is with his previous non-fiction pieces. And yet, this is what makes for such a compelling exploration of beauty. Of course, this is not to dismiss its value as one of the few, and most recent, studies on the art of Noh Theater. With so few books written on Noh Theater in the English language on the market these days, it\'s culturally refreshing to hear a contemporary voice analyze the complexities of such a mysterious artistic tradition, and it\'s furthermore remarkable that he is capable of using it as a lens through which to attempt to understand such an aesthetically abstract concept as feminine beauty. Vollmann is more than capable of holding his own with the likes of Arthur Waley, Donald Keene, Ernest Fennolosa, and Ivan Morris. Which is an incredible accomplishment for an \"ape in a cage\", who going into this book, didn\'t understand the first thing about the Noh theater, or Japanese language for that matter.

Understatement isn't exactly characteristic of William T. Vollmann's writing. In his previous journalistic attempts to understand some of the more paradoxical and confusing aspects of the world, he has exercised such an unremitting onslaught of literary hyperbole as to make it his stylistic M.O. His writing seems to exhaust the meaning of exploration. To his credit, this is also what makes his writing approach so inimitable. Rising Up, Rising Down is the most immediate example that comes to mind

Understatement isn\'t exactly characteristic of William T. Vollmann\'s writing. In his previous journalistic attempts to understand some of the more paradoxical and confusing aspects of the world, he has exercised such an unremitting onslaught of literary hyperbole as to make it his stylistic M.O. His writing seems to exhaust the meaning of exploration. To his credit, this is also what makes his writing approach so inimitable. Rising Up, Rising Down is the most immediate example that comes to mind; a 3,600 page meditation on the meaning of violence. In so many ways, it comes as no surprise that the subject for his latest non-fiction piece is the most notoriously ambiguous artistic tradition. Since the late 19th century, westerners have been simultaneously moved and confounded by Japanese Noh Theater. Ulysses S. Grant, after seeing his first Noh Play in 1879, was so moved by its subtle grace that he subsequently urged for the preservation of Noh theater. And Ernest Fennolosa, an Italian scholar of Japanese, went to great lengths to explain the technical aspects of Noh, and to introduce some of Zeami\'s famous plays to western audiences. Yet the amount of actual writings on Noh is scarce. With the exception of a few brief introductions to edited collections of classic plays (the Noh repertoire contains 250 different titles) there isn\'t exactly a definitive book on Noh in English. As Vollmann opines in the introduction of the book \"Deaf, dumb and illiterate in Japanese, innocent of formal study in any discipline of art, a graceless dancer afflicted with bad eyesight, I may not be the perfect author for any essay on Noh drama.\" Maybe not, but as is the case with most of Vollmann\'s oeuvre, his epistemology creates so much neurosis about understanding anything outside of his own personal experience, that he is always more than willing to admit that he can\'t possibly understand the subject matter at hand, regardless of how much research he does, or how many interviews he conducts. Though this is also a trademark point of motivation for his books. This endless curiosity seems to prevent satisfaction with his own cultural ignorance. And herein lies a sort of explanation as to why his books tend to be so very long and, according to some critics, overwritten. It\'s because, as a journalist, Vollmann is not content with assumption, or over-confident assessment. He\'ll never truly understand poverty, the border politics of Imperial County, prostitutes, or the Soviet Army, but his books are a way of sharing this attempt to understand and connect to some other part of the world. Still, most readers, even those familiar with Vollmann\'s work, might be inclined to ask \"Why Noh Theater?\". In the case of Kissing the Mask, Noh Theater is important because it\'s a cultural conduit through which he can channel the essence of feminine beauty. And throughout the book we follow Vollmann\'s quest to understand a little more about what it means to be a woman.

Of course, a majority of this book is specifically about Japanese Noh Theater. It\'s the cultural stepping stone for Vollmann\'s foray into the nature of feminine beauty. He traveled all throughout the island of Japan for the book, seeing most of the plays in either Kyoto or Tokyo. As always, a translator accompanied him for his interviews with various mask-makers and actors. The book begins - as does Fennolosa\'s The Classic Noh Theater of Japan, a collection of plays (mostly his notes completed by Ezra Pound) - with a brief overview of the roles of the actors, the musicians and their instruments, the stage schematics, and the relevance of the mask. There is a pretty detailed sketch of the idea of Noh Theater and how it functions formally, as the best approach to this subject for a western writer would be to begin with an elaborate description of the technical aspects of a Noh play. This is undoubtedly the most focused section of Kissing the Mask because Vollmann avoids digression at this point, trying to give the reader a coherent idea of the visual experience of a Noh play. A common criticism of his writing has been that he often assumes that the reader doesn\'t require too many explanations of the subject at hand. This may also be because he feels equally lost on this particular subject, maybe with the hope that he\'s describing it to the reader as he learns about it. He focuses on actor Umewaka Rikoru, grandson of the famous Umewaka Minoru (a Noh actor who did plays during the last days of the Shogunate, and continued acting up through the Meiji restoration period, which was a considerably difficult time for Noh actors as they lost their means of acting as a feudal lord\'s retainer). Many of the questions posed to Mr. Umewaka concern the emotional and psychological preparation of a Noh actor, most importantly, that most Noh actors strive to feel nothing on stage. As Rikoru\'s grandfather studied under Zeami, one of the first Noh play writers, as well as the most well known theoretician of the art form, Vollmann utilizes his writings on Noh as a philosophical crutch, and a helpful explanatory guide, assisting the reader through a comprehensive explanation of the underlying religious and philosophical connotations of a typical Noh play. Zeami’s theoretical writings are important to Vollmann’s understanding of Noh in that they offer insight into what is being conveyed through a majority of the plays, not simply through allusive physical gesture and stage props, such as the fan and the mask, but through the symbolic suggestiveness of the plays themselves. There is an emphasis on the concept of “the flower”, which implies the beauty of a Noh performance, as Zeami states in his Fushikaden: (Teachings on the Style and the Flower). The flower as a metaphorical concept, represents a sense of beauty that is never immediately apparent. Therefore, with a Noh actor, as with a San Francisco street prostitute, the beauty behind the flower and the mask is veiled in a superficial aesthetic; an image or representation of beauty intended to create an illusion. The actor or beauty implies grace through their own soulfulness of movement and expression. The flower of beauty is an idea that compels someone like Vollmann to endlessly probe for information or knowledge that might aid in the penetration of the mask. Is enough knowledge or research the best way to understand or obtain this beauty? This is one of the more profound questions that his book has to offer. After this rough explanation of Noh Theater, and the mysterious nature of this artistic tradition, Vollmann delves deeper into various other manifestations of female beauty in the world that might help him adequately understand what it is that defines femininity.

And so Kissing the Mask is imbued with allusions and analysis of various examples from Japanese culture. Just as much as Noh theater is essential to Vollmann’s understanding of feminine beauty, so is Lady Muraskai’s the Tale of Genji, Kawabata’s Snow Country, Geishas, Kabuki Theater, the Norse Sagas, Andrew Wyeth’s Helga Testorf drawings, Mishima’s obstinate attachment to youthful beauty, transgender women, and porn actresses. Many Noh plays, such as Kayoi Komachi (Komachi and the Hundred Nights), focus on the transient nature of existence, the disintegration of the body, and the futility of attachment to the passage of time; a mortal obsession which occupies much of the second half of the book. And this theme is to be found to some relative degree in all the aforementioned cultural and artistic examples. These are digressions, at times successful, at other times, seemingly inconsequential, that help to illuminate the initial concerns of representational beauty in Noh Theater. To summarize the importance of every cultural digression on beauty would be tiresome. What’s important is that each example emphasizes some artistic or social version of attachment to beauty. These meditations and digressions make Kissing the Mask unfocused in ways, yet help illuminate Vollmann’s central theoretical concern in others. This middle portion of the book almost caves in a way. Some readers, already struggling to keep up with the information on Noh, may feel bogged down by such an overwhelming display of cultural allusion. The intention is always clear though, and each chapter offers hours of contemplative thought. One of the intellectual consolations of the book is the thought provoking aspect of each and every one of these artistic examples of veiled beauty, how the various examples connect, and most importantly, how each one might relate to feminine beauty and the art of understatement.

In chapter 16, entitled They Just Want to Look in the Mirror: Yukiko Makes Me Over, Vollmann gets a Geisha makeover by Yukiko, a famous Japanese make-up artist. It’s a particularly entertaining section, and a moment of the trademark self-insertion of Vollmann into his subject matter, that he is so well known for. Now he can look into the mirror to truly ponder what a woman is, more importantly, in what way it is possible to create the illusion of feminine beauty. For, as he states in the fourth chapter with the help of some of Mr. Umewaka’s thoughts on the illusion of beauty in Noh, “… one of the many astonishing achievements of Noh is when a dumpy old man becomes a lovely young girl, all the while showing his swollen feet in the white tabi socks and working his Adam’s apple as he sings in his old man’s bass. No matter what his body is, the young girl lives in him! He possesses the true flower.” So then, if the flower blooms by maintaining secrecy, is the mask of feminine beauty always an illusion? He attempts to find out by putting himself behind the mask of the Geisha. There is a beauty to this display of curiosity about beauty, in and of itself. And reading Vollmann muse on the seemingly feminine image in the mirror in front of him (not to mention being able to view the pictures that he takes of himself) is one of the most moving passages of the book.

Readers less interested in exploring some of the more classic Noh plays and artistic allusions in Kissing the Mask, will be more interested in the case of Mishima Yukio, the infamous Japanese novelist who committed Seppuku in 1970, supposedly motivated by an attempted coup d\'etat, and wrote modern versions of some of the famous plays of Zeami. Mishima was a writer, notorious for several theatrical personas, which were all part of a lifetime attempt to create an artistic legacy out of aesthetic contrivances. As Paul Schrader has suggested, in his film Mishima: A Life in Four Chapters, Mishima\'s obsession with the essentially transient beauty of youth prevented him from being capable of dying honorably, in full acceptance of the lamentable process of aging. Even though his famous ritual suicide is often associated with what is typically considered an honorable death. As Donald Richie states so calmly in his Japan Journals, \"The theatricality of this sort of death, as melodramatic as the plots of any of Mishima\'s plays, was a necessary piece in the life so spectacularly terminated. That is what I thought of when I learned of Mishima\'s suicide. There was no surprise.\" Early on, in his description of the beauty of feminine allusiveness, and an aspect of Noh Theater that makes its own ambiguity so astounding, Vollmann comments on its ability to surprise the spectator with the symbolical nuances of beauty that are never immediately apparent. Mishima, in his rebellion, not only against his own self-hatred, but against the accepting nature of the transience of beauty and young age that the tradition of Noh Theater embodies, lets his characters pursue their vain obsessions to a delusional degree. His example might as well blend into the miasma of cultural allusion that Vollmann has to offer, but it should also stand out as a sort of moral allegory within this text. Mishima\'s attachment decries the Shintoesque calmness and acceptance of death and aging that all Noh plays attempt to convey. To be more precise, concerning this particular book; the lesson that Vollmann aims to instruct most of his readers on through the example of his own stubbornness, is that the attachment to an understanding of beauty is analogous to madness and confusion. It will not show us the true nature of beauty. Rather it will put us at war with its essence. Hence, the case of Mishima Yukio, and the vain futility of attachment.

What is feminine beauty? What is Grace? What is Poverty? What is Violence? To approach any of these questions with the assumption that enough knowledge and self-education can assist one in coming to a satisfying conclusion is a fallacy. So why should the average reader invest the time that it takes to read four-hundred or more pages full of ponderous meditations? It\'s because insatiable curiosity informs our motives for reading books in the first place. This intellectual desire to come to a conclusion, or wrap up a complicated question is wholly absent from Vollmann\'s treatise on beauty, as it is with his previous non-fiction pieces. And yet, this is what makes for such a compelling exploration of beauty. Of course, this is not to dismiss its value as one of the few, and most recent, studies on the art of Noh Theater. With so few books written on Noh Theater in the English language on the market these days, it\'s culturally refreshing to hear a contemporary voice analyze the complexities of such a mysterious artistic tradition, and it\'s furthermore remarkable that he is capable of using it as a lens through which to attempt to understand such an aesthetically abstract concept as feminine beauty. Vollmann is more than capable of holding his own with the likes of Arthur Waley, Donald Keene, Ernest Fennolosa, and Ivan Morris. Which is an incredible accomplishment for an \"ape in a cage\", who going into this book, didn\'t understand the first thing about the Noh theater, or Japanese language for that matter.

Also posted at Feminist Review.

Full disclosure: I am an avid fan of William T. Vollmann's work and was excited to read this book. Vollmann often has strange and interesting things to say about women and gender relations, and his notorious interest in prostitutes (who feature prominently in both his fiction and non-fiction) may almost be labeled as an obsession. In his latest book, Kissing The Mask, Vollmann concentrates on the nature of femininity by viewing it primarily through the lens of the

Also posted at Feminist Review.

Full disclosure: I am an avid fan of William T. Vollmann\'s work and was excited to read this book. Vollmann often has strange and interesting things to say about women and gender relations, and his notorious interest in prostitutes (who feature prominently in both his fiction and non-fiction) may almost be labeled as an obsession. In his latest book, Kissing The Mask, Vollmann concentrates on the nature of femininity by viewing it primarily through the lens of the ancient, gorgeous masks of Japanese Noh theater. It is also a meditation on the idea of femininity as a staged performance.

Noh theater is far too complex to encapsulate in just a few sentences, and Vollmann himself often professes trouble in defining it thoroughly. At first glance, Noh seems a bizarre choice of medium through which to focus on femininity, as most Noh actors are male and men traditionally play the roles of women with the aid of costuming and masks. However, Vollmann directs his attention, and the readers\', to the beautifully rendered Noh masks representing female characters. These become a metaphor for the “mask” of femininity that many women wear: makeup, jewelry, clothing, and other adornments that are more or less socially mandated.

Similarly, the elaborate and carefully orchestrated movements on the Noh stage are analogous to the “staged” femininity also involving complex, time-consuming, and money-burning ornamentation that often results in constricted and painful mobility. Vollmann is concerned with what “manifests” a woman as opposed to what a woman “is,” and in this endeavor he visits Japanese geishas and transvestites, both of whom could be said to wear the feminine mask. He digresses into history of what other cultures have traditionally considered “beautiful,” and manages to weave in thoughts about porn stars and artists\' muses.

Vollmann readily admits that he perceives women as “the other,” and is fully aware of the fact that he is viewing women through the privilege of a male gaze. He waxes rhapsodic about female beauty throughout the text, basically elevating women on a very high and poetic pedestal, which made me slightly uncomfortable; when a person (or entire gender) is put up on a pedestal, it\'s a long way to fall. Vollmann appears to genuinely like and respect women, however, and my discomfort was minor and temporary. He also, as in his other nonfiction books, makes no pretense about being an objective observer; he is fully immersed as a character in his own true story.

Kissing The Mask is highly valuable as a look into the secretive, baroque, and intricate Japanese subcultures of Noh theater and geisha teahouses, with the author\'s personal study of staged femininity mostly as a bonus. Furthermore, it\'s enriched with William Vollmann\'s gorgeous and almost lyrical prose, plenty of photographs and drawings, several appendices with notes and chronologies, and a glossary for the many Japanese words and phrases liberally sprinkled through the material.

Also posted at Feminist Review.

Full disclosure: I am an avid fan of William T. Vollmann's work and was excited to read this book. Vollmann often has strange and interesting things to say about women and gender relations, and his notorious interest in prostitutes (who feature prominently in both his fiction and non-fiction) may almost be labeled as an obsession. In his latest book, Kissing The Mask, Vollmann concentrates on the nature of femininity by viewing it primarily through the lens of the

Also posted at Feminist Review.

Full disclosure: I am an avid fan of William T. Vollmann\'s work and was excited to read this book. Vollmann often has strange and interesting things to say about women and gender relations, and his notorious interest in prostitutes (who feature prominently in both his fiction and non-fiction) may almost be labeled as an obsession. In his latest book, Kissing The Mask, Vollmann concentrates on the nature of femininity by viewing it primarily through the lens of the ancient, gorgeous masks of Japanese Noh theater. It is also a meditation on the idea of femininity as a staged performance.

Noh theater is far too complex to encapsulate in just a few sentences, and Vollmann himself often professes trouble in defining it thoroughly. At first glance, Noh seems a bizarre choice of medium through which to focus on femininity, as most Noh actors are male and men traditionally play the roles of women with the aid of costuming and masks. However, Vollmann directs his attention, and the readers\', to the beautifully rendered Noh masks representing female characters. These become a metaphor for the “mask” of femininity that many women wear: makeup, jewelry, clothing, and other adornments that are more or less socially mandated.

Similarly, the elaborate and carefully orchestrated movements on the Noh stage are analogous to the “staged” femininity also involving complex, time-consuming, and money-burning ornamentation that often results in constricted and painful mobility. Vollmann is concerned with what “manifests” a woman as opposed to what a woman “is,” and in this endeavor he visits Japanese geishas and transvestites, both of whom could be said to wear the feminine mask. He digresses into history of what other cultures have traditionally considered “beautiful,” and manages to weave in thoughts about porn stars and artists\' muses.

Vollmann readily admits that he perceives women as “the other,” and is fully aware of the fact that he is viewing women through the privilege of a male gaze. He waxes rhapsodic about female beauty throughout the text, basically elevating women on a very high and poetic pedestal, which made me slightly uncomfortable; when a person (or entire gender) is put up on a pedestal, it\'s a long way to fall. Vollmann appears to genuinely like and respect women, however, and my discomfort was minor and temporary. He also, as in his other nonfiction books, makes no pretense about being an objective observer; he is fully immersed as a character in his own true story.

Kissing The Mask is highly valuable as a look into the secretive, baroque, and intricate Japanese subcultures of Noh theater and geisha teahouses, with the author\'s personal study of staged femininity mostly as a bonus. Furthermore, it\'s enriched with William Vollmann\'s gorgeous and almost lyrical prose, plenty of photographs and drawings, several appendices with notes and chronologies, and a glossary for the many Japanese words and phrases liberally sprinkled through the material.

CREDITS ::
(view spoiler)[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

U

[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

U

CREDITS ::
(view spoiler)[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

Unidentified mask from SFGate review by David D’Arcy ::


Two photos of Bill : “‘They Just Want to Look in the Mirror’: WTV Becomes a Woman”, original publication of chapter 16 in Vice.


Andrew Wyeth: The Helga Pictures. You art people probably already have that book ; I grab\'d the picture in a very internetly manner.

(hide spoiler)]

[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

Unidentified mask from SFGate review by David D’Arcy ::


Two photos of Bill : “‘They Just Want to Look in the Mirror’: WTV Becomes a Woman”, original publication of chapter 16 in Vice.


Andrew Wyeth: The Helga Pictures. You art people probably already have that book ; I grab\'d the picture in a very internetly manner.

(hide spoiler)]

CREDITS ::
(view spoiler)[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

U

[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

U

CREDITS ::
(view spoiler)[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

Unidentified mask from SFGate review by David D’Arcy ::


Two photos of Bill : “‘They Just Want to Look in the Mirror’: WTV Becomes a Woman”, original publication of chapter 16 in Vice.


Andrew Wyeth: The Helga Pictures. You art people probably already have that book ; I grab\'d the picture in a very internetly manner.

(hide spoiler)]

[(and links to reviews and things that will interest you)


Mask sketches by Stina Löfgren for Pico Iyer’s review in NYTBR;


WTV with Geishas Konomi-san and Kofumi-san (photo courtesy of the author) ::


Mask being carved :

NYRB review (paywall) by Ian Buruma, “The Mystery of Female Grace” ::

Unidentified mask from SFGate review by David D’Arcy ::


Two photos of Bill : “‘They Just Want to Look in the Mirror’: WTV Becomes a Woman”, original publication of chapter 16 in Vice.


Andrew Wyeth: The Helga Pictures. You art people probably already have that book ; I grab\'d the picture in a very internetly manner.

(hide spoiler)]

Some excellent stuff here, but also some rambling and the occasional (for this reader) overly lyrical evocation of the Goddess and the bewitching and transcendent Feminine. I agree with him that "feminine beauty" has an element of "grace", but feel that he neglects the biological sources of his emotional and physical response to these performed femininities – surely part of the lure of the male Noh actor moving as a woman is that these echoes stir and stimulate our primitive self, a self which s

Some excellent stuff here, but also some rambling and the occasional (for this reader) overly lyrical evocation of the Goddess and the bewitching and transcendent Feminine. I agree with him that \"feminine beauty\" has an element of \"grace\", but feel that he neglects the biological sources of his emotional and physical response to these performed femininities – surely part of the lure of the male Noh actor moving as a woman is that these echoes stir and stimulate our primitive self, a self which sees real breasts and real vagina under the robes and is incapable of seeing \"just\" a performance - the mating instinct cannot see the mask.

WTV has written down his thoughts, his experiences, his preliminary and hesitant views. He takes great pains to remind us he is an \"ape\" and ignorant about those things he discusses, as though to head off any potential criticism for his lack of focus or the sometimes contradictory nature of his arguments.

I don’t know. There was some great thinking here, and a real empathetic concern with those he spoke of, but also some trite theorising and some passages of (sorry NR) what I can only describe as \"purple prose\" which I found almost laughable in their adolescent floridity.

Frustrating. Occasionally great, and he is clearly a very intelligent, concerned, compassionate and interesting writer and yet, somehow, it all seems to fall apart in my hands…

Some excellent stuff here, but also some rambling and the occasional (for this reader) overly lyrical evocation of the Goddess and the bewitching and transcendent Feminine. I agree with him that "feminine beauty" has an element of "grace", but feel that he neglects the biological sources of his emotional and physical response to these performed femininities – surely part of the lure of the male Noh actor moving as a woman is that these echoes stir and stimulate our primitive self, a self which s

Some excellent stuff here, but also some rambling and the occasional (for this reader) overly lyrical evocation of the Goddess and the bewitching and transcendent Feminine. I agree with him that \"feminine beauty\" has an element of \"grace\", but feel that he neglects the biological sources of his emotional and physical response to these performed femininities – surely part of the lure of the male Noh actor moving as a woman is that these echoes stir and stimulate our primitive self, a self which sees real breasts and real vagina under the robes and is incapable of seeing \"just\" a performance - the mating instinct cannot see the mask.

WTV has written down his thoughts, his experiences, his preliminary and hesitant views. He takes great pains to remind us he is an \"ape\" and ignorant about those things he discusses, as though to head off any potential criticism for his lack of focus or the sometimes contradictory nature of his arguments.

I don’t know. There was some great thinking here, and a real empathetic concern with those he spoke of, but also some trite theorising and some passages of (sorry NR) what I can only describe as \"purple prose\" which I found almost laughable in their adolescent floridity.

Frustrating. Occasionally great, and he is clearly a very intelligent, concerned, compassionate and interesting writer and yet, somehow, it all seems to fall apart in my hands…

Actually, 3.5 stars...

William T. Vollmann's Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement, and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater (2010) has the subtitle with thoughts on Muses, Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Housewives, Makeup Artists, Geishas, Valkyries and Venus Figurines ! This is a pretty clear warning that the book is likely to wander. Vollmann himself calls it "this string-ball of idle thoughts". It is first and foremost an introduction to the world of Noh theater

Actually, 3.5 stars...

William T. Vollmann\'s Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement, and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater (2010) has the subtitle with thoughts on Muses, Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Housewives, Makeup Artists, Geishas, Valkyries and Venus Figurines ! This is a pretty clear warning that the book is likely to wander. Vollmann himself calls it \"this string-ball of idle thoughts\". It is first and foremost an introduction to the world of Noh theater by an amateur enthusiast, as well as that enthusiast\'s declaration of love for Noh. To tell you the truth, Noh would have been one of the last things I would have thought could appeal to Vollmann, but then I have only read his Whores For Gloria . What a whiplashing contrast there is between his early Whores For Gloria and this book, between dismal depths of human degradation (*) and the calm but intense artistic purity of Noh theater!

Vollmann apologizes at length and often for being an \"ape in a cage\", for not having the background and knowledge to fully appreciate this subtle art form. But he nonetheless obtained generous access to some of the most important people in Noh, as well as detailed advice from some serious experts, and an extensive bibliography and endnotes make it clear that he did his research (no one familiar with Vollmann\'s work ethic could be surprised). Vollmann did not embarrass himself in that regard.

Though, of course, Noh grew out of earlier forms of theater and performance, including Shinto dances and chants, it attained its unique and traditional form in the fourteenth century due largely to the efforts of a father and son team, Kiyotsugu Kwanami (or Kanami) (1333-1384) and Motokiyo Zeami (or Seami or Kanze) (1363-1443/4). Zeami became the theorist of Noh, writing essays about its aesthetics, and composed many of the plays which became the models for later authors. He also wrote very concrete and practical advice for Noh actors. Some of these essays are assiduously kept secret by the oldest troupes, which are associated with families - either you are born into the family or adopted into it if you want to be a Noh actor. Of the five main schools/families of Noh in our age, Vollmann spent most of his time with members of the dominant Kanze school, which has direct family ties to Zeami. Though the occasional woman was a Noh actor in the far past, all roles have been performed by men for a very long time, with few exceptions (women do study with one of Vollmann\'s main contacts; these women had to learn how to play the women \"with a man\'s strength\"). And this is one of the aspects of Noh which occupy Vollmann the most.

Indeed, this aspect of Noh led Vollmann to reflect on the nature of femininity; why is it an often elderly man can convincingly evoke a beautiful young woman with an exquisite mask, a gorgeous kimono and a few restrained gestures? This question then led Vollmann to look into the corresponding arts of transvestites.(**)

And so the reader is led far afield from the detailed descriptions of the experience of Noh theater, from the summaries of Noh plays, from the lengthy examination of types, appearances, and roles of the multitude of masks employed in Noh(***), from the excerpts of interviews in which Vollmann is trying hard to get actors and mask carvers, who do not express themselves in words (or at least not their own), to help him, a man of words, to see inside their experience, to finally arrive at the question of what is the feminine?

Vollmann flatly states \"for me, the representation of femininity is the profoundest art,\" and he proceeds to rake Zeami\'s writings on the aesthetics of Noh over his own coals, seeking to detect/project Zeami\'s agreement. He drops that for a while and contemplates Zeami\'s admonition that balance must always be maintained, runs that through his experience with photography, recalls Celine, Rachmaninoff and Gauguin and constates that balance is not a prerequisite for beauty, then returns to Noh where


the lovely woman approaches, sliding silently across the stage, the ancient mask of her face shining warmly like ivory. She is not a woman - not only because she is a man but also because she is inhuman: perfect grace and womanhood itself. Slowly, slowly she inclines her head, and her face alters expression an infinity of times, each expression feminine, tranquilly lovely, and alien to the faces of any of the living women I have ever known.


Vollmann has not offered us a treatise on Noh, nor even on femininity. Though there is much information about Noh in this book, and much sharing of how Vollmann views femininity, the style of this book is more of an extended essay, or an obscenely bloated version of what the Japanese call a zuihitsu , where the author is to follow his brush, his thoughts, in whatever associative, deductive, inductive manner presents itself to his mind at the given moment. Clearly, Vollmann had to give some thought to the loose organization of such a lengthy book, but it consists of ruminative exploration, occasionally punctuated with disclaimers like \"Set this aside for a moment, or for the rest of your life. I am not sure whether I believe it myself.\" And then on to the next rumination.

Vollmann\'s exegesis of feminine beauty in the pre-modern Japanese context convincingly drew my attention to a crucial point I did not previously appreciate. Feminine beauty was not to be seen , only, at most, glimpsed . The stunning kimonos, obis, etc. and the black sheen of the long hair studded with costly hairpins and combs drew the attention away from the body and the face. As Lady Murasaki wrote, \"The moon was so bright that I was embarrassed to be seen and knew not where to hide.\"

But the reader must be prepared to find very little resolved in these lengthy meditations; the detailed, side-by-side comparison of two female beauties - the Noh mask with the face of a Japanese porn queen - peters out into inconclusiveness; the following interview with the Noh mask maker constates the obvious - the mask is not lifelike - but when asked, in this case why is it beautiful, the response is \"That\'s what I\'m always wondering, actually.\" And so it goes in Vollmann\'s search for the nature of feminine beauty. From contemporary beauty ads to Chretien de Troyes to Norse sagas; from the Manyoshu to the Renaissance poet Giovanni Giovano Pontano and then Yeats.

It doesn\'t much matter what I think of this book, but, in case someone may be curious, I found it engaging and generally interesting. There are few non-specialist books on Noh in English, and Vollmann\'s fascination with it is contagious. But, on occasion, it seemed to me that he was proceeding like the laziest kind of reporter, going to the street and interviewing the first person/woman/transvestite willing to talk to him. And I found some of his paeans to womanhood to have crossed the line into forced literary artifice, which I found doesn\'t suit him. But perhaps that\'s just me. Read it yourself; you certainly won\'t find another book like it!

(*) When I wrote in my review of Whores



\"the most desperate, diseased, sliding-along-the-filthy-bottom-of-the-barrel prostitutes in San Francisco\'s Tenderloin district,\" I was understating the case; a few of the scenes in that book had me ready to bolt from the room.

(**) Vollmann is nonjudgmental, but it appears to me that he hasn\'t much experience with transvestites, for his reported interaction with them was very limited and was not particularly empathetic; it seemed he was examining the curious fauna instead of feeling his way into their lives as he usually does. In any case, he brought very little away from these interactions for the book.

(***) Vollmann\'s fascination with the masks definitely exceeded mine, but then he had these beautiful objects before his eyes, while the reader has only the photos Vollmann made for the book. Although I have the first edition hardback, the reproduction of the photos is truly execrable. Ecco should be ashamed.

Actually, 3.5 stars...

William T. Vollmann's Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement, and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater (2010) has the subtitle with thoughts on Muses, Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Housewives, Makeup Artists, Geishas, Valkyries and Venus Figurines ! This is a pretty clear warning that the book is likely to wander. Vollmann himself calls it "this string-ball of idle thoughts". It is first and foremost an introduction to the world of Noh theater

Actually, 3.5 stars...

William T. Vollmann\'s Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement, and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater (2010) has the subtitle with thoughts on Muses, Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Housewives, Makeup Artists, Geishas, Valkyries and Venus Figurines ! This is a pretty clear warning that the book is likely to wander. Vollmann himself calls it \"this string-ball of idle thoughts\". It is first and foremost an introduction to the world of Noh theater by an amateur enthusiast, as well as that enthusiast\'s declaration of love for Noh. To tell you the truth, Noh would have been one of the last things I would have thought could appeal to Vollmann, but then I have only read his Whores For Gloria . What a whiplashing contrast there is between his early Whores For Gloria and this book, between dismal depths of human degradation (*) and the calm but intense artistic purity of Noh theater!

Vollmann apologizes at length and often for being an \"ape in a cage\", for not having the background and knowledge to fully appreciate this subtle art form. But he nonetheless obtained generous access to some of the most important people in Noh, as well as detailed advice from some serious experts, and an extensive bibliography and endnotes make it clear that he did his research (no one familiar with Vollmann\'s work ethic could be surprised). Vollmann did not embarrass himself in that regard.

Though, of course, Noh grew out of earlier forms of theater and performance, including Shinto dances and chants, it attained its unique and traditional form in the fourteenth century due largely to the efforts of a father and son team, Kiyotsugu Kwanami (or Kanami) (1333-1384) and Motokiyo Zeami (or Seami or Kanze) (1363-1443/4). Zeami became the theorist of Noh, writing essays about its aesthetics, and composed many of the plays which became the models for later authors. He also wrote very concrete and practical advice for Noh actors. Some of these essays are assiduously kept secret by the oldest troupes, which are associated with families - either you are born into the family or adopted into it if you want to be a Noh actor. Of the five main schools/families of Noh in our age, Vollmann spent most of his time with members of the dominant Kanze school, which has direct family ties to Zeami. Though the occasional woman was a Noh actor in the far past, all roles have been performed by men for a very long time, with few exceptions (women do study with one of Vollmann\'s main contacts; these women had to learn how to play the women \"with a man\'s strength\"). And this is one of the aspects of Noh which occupy Vollmann the most.

Indeed, this aspect of Noh led Vollmann to reflect on the nature of femininity; why is it an often elderly man can convincingly evoke a beautiful young woman with an exquisite mask, a gorgeous kimono and a few restrained gestures? This question then led Vollmann to look into the corresponding arts of transvestites.(**)

And so the reader is led far afield from the detailed descriptions of the experience of Noh theater, from the summaries of Noh plays, from the lengthy examination of types, appearances, and roles of the multitude of masks employed in Noh(***), from the excerpts of interviews in which Vollmann is trying hard to get actors and mask carvers, who do not express themselves in words (or at least not their own), to help him, a man of words, to see inside their experience, to finally arrive at the question of what is the feminine?

Vollmann flatly states \"for me, the representation of femininity is the profoundest art,\" and he proceeds to rake Zeami\'s writings on the aesthetics of Noh over his own coals, seeking to detect/project Zeami\'s agreement. He drops that for a while and contemplates Zeami\'s admonition that balance must always be maintained, runs that through his experience with photography, recalls Celine, Rachmaninoff and Gauguin and constates that balance is not a prerequisite for beauty, then returns to Noh where


the lovely woman approaches, sliding silently across the stage, the ancient mask of her face shining warmly like ivory. She is not a woman - not only because she is a man but also because she is inhuman: perfect grace and womanhood itself. Slowly, slowly she inclines her head, and her face alters expression an infinity of times, each expression feminine, tranquilly lovely, and alien to the faces of any of the living women I have ever known.


Vollmann has not offered us a treatise on Noh, nor even on femininity. Though there is much information about Noh in this book, and much sharing of how Vollmann views femininity, the style of this book is more of an extended essay, or an obscenely bloated version of what the Japanese call a zuihitsu , where the author is to follow his brush, his thoughts, in whatever associative, deductive, inductive manner presents itself to his mind at the given moment. Clearly, Vollmann had to give some thought to the loose organization of such a lengthy book, but it consists of ruminative exploration, occasionally punctuated with disclaimers like \"Set this aside for a moment, or for the rest of your life. I am not sure whether I believe it myself.\" And then on to the next rumination.

Vollmann\'s exegesis of feminine beauty in the pre-modern Japanese context convincingly drew my attention to a crucial point I did not previously appreciate. Feminine beauty was not to be seen , only, at most, glimpsed . The stunning kimonos, obis, etc. and the black sheen of the long hair studded with costly hairpins and combs drew the attention away from the body and the face. As Lady Murasaki wrote, \"The moon was so bright that I was embarrassed to be seen and knew not where to hide.\"

But the reader must be prepared to find very little resolved in these lengthy meditations; the detailed, side-by-side comparison of two female beauties - the Noh mask with the face of a Japanese porn queen - peters out into inconclusiveness; the following interview with the Noh mask maker constates the obvious - the mask is not lifelike - but when asked, in this case why is it beautiful, the response is \"That\'s what I\'m always wondering, actually.\" And so it goes in Vollmann\'s search for the nature of feminine beauty. From contemporary beauty ads to Chretien de Troyes to Norse sagas; from the Manyoshu to the Renaissance poet Giovanni Giovano Pontano and then Yeats.

It doesn\'t much matter what I think of this book, but, in case someone may be curious, I found it engaging and generally interesting. There are few non-specialist books on Noh in English, and Vollmann\'s fascination with it is contagious. But, on occasion, it seemed to me that he was proceeding like the laziest kind of reporter, going to the street and interviewing the first person/woman/transvestite willing to talk to him. And I found some of his paeans to womanhood to have crossed the line into forced literary artifice, which I found doesn\'t suit him. But perhaps that\'s just me. Read it yourself; you certainly won\'t find another book like it!

(*) When I wrote in my review of Whores



\"the most desperate, diseased, sliding-along-the-filthy-bottom-of-the-barrel prostitutes in San Francisco\'s Tenderloin district,\" I was understating the case; a few of the scenes in that book had me ready to bolt from the room.

(**) Vollmann is nonjudgmental, but it appears to me that he hasn\'t much experience with transvestites, for his reported interaction with them was very limited and was not particularly empathetic; it seemed he was examining the curious fauna instead of feeling his way into their lives as he usually does. In any case, he brought very little away from these interactions for the book.

(***) Vollmann\'s fascination with the masks definitely exceeded mine, but then he had these beautiful objects before his eyes, while the reader has only the photos Vollmann made for the book. Although I have the first edition hardback, the reproduction of the photos is truly execrable. Ecco should be ashamed.

When something starts essentially as "I'm no expert in Japanese history or culture, but I'm gonna act like I am throughout this" alarm bells start ringing.

When something starts essentially as \"I\'m no expert in Japanese history or culture, but I\'m gonna act like I am throughout this\" alarm bells start ringing.

When something starts essentially as "I'm no expert in Japanese history or culture, but I'm gonna act like I am throughout this" alarm bells start ringing.

Hoo boy. I want to read this, but more importantly, I want William Vollmann to be my friend. What an amazingly fascinating nutcase! He's so prolific, and so eclectic, and so just balls-out crazy. And he does not give a smidge of a shit what anyone thinks or says about it. This book's title (+ subtitle) is thirty-four words long. Thirty-four! (Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater With Some Thoughts on Muses (especially Helga Testorf), Transgender Women,

Hoo boy. I want to read this, but more importantly, I want William Vollmann to be my friend. What an amazingly fascinating nutcase! He\'s so prolific, and so eclectic, and so just balls-out crazy. And he does not give a smidge of a shit what anyone thinks or says about it. This book\'s title (+ subtitle) is thirty-four words long. Thirty-four! (Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater With Some Thoughts on Muses (especially Helga Testorf), Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Housewives, Makeup Artists, Geishas, Valkyries and Venus Figurines) What? Parentheticals in a freaking subtitle? A list of all the shit you can possibly think of? Amazing. And, of course, also fucking insanely brilliant and absurd. Boy oh boy oh boy, Vollmann, you crazy awesome dude.

Here\'s a piece of the review from The Oregonian via Powells:

Characteristically peripatetic, Kissing the Mask rambles across vast territory in an effort to corral -- or at least contemplate -- the concept of feminine beauty. Throughout, Vollmann focuses an obsessed and adoring lens on the Noh master Umewaka Rokuro, the Kabuki geishas, and a transgender community in Los Angeles while simultaneously traipsing through Indian, American, European and Norse cultures in an effort to identify what it is (presumption? physiology? carriage?) that makes a woman a woman. Along the way, he pays homage yet again to his pet subject -- prostitutes -- about whom he has notoriously raved and written throughout his career.

Hoo boy. I want to read this, but more importantly, I want William Vollmann to be my friend. What an amazingly fascinating nutcase! He's so prolific, and so eclectic, and so just balls-out crazy. And he does not give a smidge of a shit what anyone thinks or says about it. This book's title (+ subtitle) is thirty-four words long. Thirty-four! (Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater With Some Thoughts on Muses (especially Helga Testorf), Transgender Women,

Hoo boy. I want to read this, but more importantly, I want William Vollmann to be my friend. What an amazingly fascinating nutcase! He\'s so prolific, and so eclectic, and so just balls-out crazy. And he does not give a smidge of a shit what anyone thinks or says about it. This book\'s title (+ subtitle) is thirty-four words long. Thirty-four! (Kissing the Mask: Beauty, Understatement and Femininity in Japanese Noh Theater With Some Thoughts on Muses (especially Helga Testorf), Transgender Women, Kabuki Goddesses, Porn Queens, Poets, Housewives, Makeup Artists, Geishas, Valkyries and Venus Figurines) What? Parentheticals in a freaking subtitle? A list of all the shit you can possibly think of? Amazing. And, of course, also fucking insanely brilliant and absurd. Boy oh boy oh boy, Vollmann, you crazy awesome dude.

Here\'s a piece of the review from The Oregonian via Powells:

Characteristically peripatetic, Kissing the Mask rambles across vast territory in an effort to corral -- or at least contemplate -- the concept of feminine beauty. Throughout, Vollmann focuses an obsessed and adoring lens on the Noh master Umewaka Rokuro, the Kabuki geishas, and a transgender community in Los Angeles while simultaneously traipsing through Indian, American, European and Norse cultures in an effort to identify what it is (presumption? physiology? carriage?) that makes a woman a woman. Along the way, he pays homage yet again to his pet subject -- prostitutes -- about whom he has notoriously raved and written throughout his career.

...I just... didn't find this very engaging, interesting, insightful, or focused.

Definitely the rare dud in the Vollmann Oeuvre (I also really didn't like The Royal Family; although others have loved it)

...I just... didn\'t find this very engaging, interesting, insightful, or focused.

Definitely the rare dud in the Vollmann Oeuvre (I also really didn\'t like The Royal Family; although others have loved it)

...I just... didn't find this very engaging, interesting, insightful, or focused.

Definitely the rare dud in the Vollmann Oeuvre (I also really didn't like The Royal Family; although others have loved it)

...I just... didn\'t find this very engaging, interesting, insightful, or focused.

Definitely the rare dud in the Vollmann Oeuvre (I also really didn\'t like The Royal Family; although others have loved it)

Granted I just began reading this book however, I am enjoying it. Vollmann has a beautiful love for Noh theater, it is apparent in his through research and knowledge of this book. It is refreshing to see that as silly as that sounds. I have found myself rereading certain parts of the book just to get a greater grasp of what he is speaking about. I would love to visit Japan one of these days however that is a pipe dream for the moment. I am looking forward to reading the rest of it.

Granted I just began reading this book however, I am enjoying it. Vollmann has a beautiful love for Noh theater, it is apparent in his through research and knowledge of this book. It is refreshing to see that as silly as that sounds. I have found myself rereading certain parts of the book just to get a greater grasp of what he is speaking about. I would love to visit Japan one of these days however that is a pipe dream for the moment. I am looking forward to reading the rest of it.

I wasn't sure of the book at first because I'm getting tired of this jerking to Eastern ideology and culture (take that any way you'd like to), but I ended up really enjoying it.

More than just a study of feminism in Japanese culture and in the lgbt community, it is a great study on the question "What makes one a women?" The author gives great respect and distance to those interviewed.

I wasn\'t sure of the book at first because I\'m getting tired of this jerking to Eastern ideology and culture (take that any way you\'d like to), but I ended up really enjoying it.

More than just a study of feminism in Japanese culture and in the lgbt community, it is a great study on the question \"What makes one a women?\" The author gives great respect and distance to those interviewed.

I wasn't sure of the book at first because I'm getting tired of this jerking to Eastern ideology and culture (take that any way you'd like to), but I ended up really enjoying it.

More than just a study of feminism in Japanese culture and in the lgbt community, it is a great study on the question "What makes one a women?" The author gives great respect and distance to those interviewed.

I wasn\'t sure of the book at first because I\'m getting tired of this jerking to Eastern ideology and culture (take that any way you\'d like to), but I ended up really enjoying it.

More than just a study of feminism in Japanese culture and in the lgbt community, it is a great study on the question \"What makes one a women?\" The author gives great respect and distance to those interviewed.

Vollmann is one of those blessed souls who wanders the earth looking for the essence of beauty. Fortunately for beauty, the paths are endless and words do not suffice. Fortunately for us, Vollmann's prose is gorgeous and we don't mind joining his trip.

Vollmann is one of those blessed souls who wanders the earth looking for the essence of beauty. Fortunately for beauty, the paths are endless and words do not suffice. Fortunately for us, Vollmann\'s prose is gorgeous and we don\'t mind joining his trip.

Vollmann is one of those blessed souls who wanders the earth looking for the essence of beauty. Fortunately for beauty, the paths are endless and words do not suffice. Fortunately for us, Vollmann's prose is gorgeous and we don't mind joining his trip.

Vollmann is one of those blessed souls who wanders the earth looking for the essence of beauty. Fortunately for beauty, the paths are endless and words do not suffice. Fortunately for us, Vollmann\'s prose is gorgeous and we don\'t mind joining his trip.

Entertaining reading from a generally creepy dude

Entertaining reading from a generally creepy dude

Late in his improbably greenlit study-of-women-via-a-centuries-old-Japanese-art-form, Vollmann writes: "My voyeurism makes me forget that the world is in fact not a stage" and, considering the aim of his study, this would a detrimental point of criticism; however, anyone who has read Vollmann's work (as they assuredly have if they're coming to this pleasantly non-essential addition to his bibliography) know he is someone that, even in an outside position, never seems to have any distance between

Late in his improbably greenlit study-of-women-via-a-centuries-old-Japanese-art-form, Vollmann writes: \"My voyeurism makes me forget that the world is in fact not a stage\" and, considering the aim of his study, this would a detrimental point of criticism; however, anyone who has read Vollmann\'s work (as they assuredly have if they\'re coming to this pleasantly non-essential addition to his bibliography) know he is someone that, even in an outside position, never seems to have any distance between himself and his subjects.
Kissing the Mask is classic Vollmann:his frighteningly extensive depth of literary knowledge combined with his love of prostitutes (and their culture) is allowed to run rampant in his take on centuries old aspects of Japanese culture; which is the true aim of this book.
Consistently, but not constantly, reminding the reader of his position as an \"ape in a cage\" when it comes to Noh theater (even if he seems to effortlessly discuss handfuls of plays with the simplicity of a subject-master), Vollmann may be more interested in women as a subject (or just in general) than the aspects of ancient Japanese culture that act as his lens, but his true curiosities lie in Noh theater and Geisha culture; the \"beauty, understatement and feminity\" of the book\'s subtitle is merely a place to hinge his thoughts and, let\'s be honest, keep his page count to a trim (for Vollmann standards) 400 pages.
And why not? Noh theater is such a strange and fascinating-on-the-page that it seems both both hard to ignore as a man of letters and yet impossible to take on directly (even by those masters that Vollmann somehow charms to candidness throughout the book): where else does an art form slow down over time? In an era where movies, songs, books and seemingly ever other art form is shrinking to fit shortened attention spans, it is so strange to hear of anything that has become longer, slower, and somehow more arcane over time.
Where else is falling asleep during a performance an accepted norm? Per Vollmann\'s description, Japanese salary men move in strange synchronicity to pay to watch heavily make-up\'d women sing, pay more to have themselves made-up and hidden away to watch themselves gender-transformed, and then catch their Z\'s while masked men sing in baritones to represent young girls.
The subject is fascinating as long as you don\'t actually have to sit through a Noh play and in Vollmann\'s hands its damned enjoyable too; just don\'t expect to fully understand his extensive, extended metaphors and allusions nor his desire to kiss a centuries-old wooden mask of a young girl as an old Noh actor\'s adam\'s apple bobs in song beneath.

Late in his improbably greenlit study-of-women-via-a-centuries-old-Japanese-art-form, Vollmann writes: "My voyeurism makes me forget that the world is in fact not a stage" and, considering the aim of his study, this would a detrimental point of criticism; however, anyone who has read Vollmann's work (as they assuredly have if they're coming to this pleasantly non-essential addition to his bibliography) know he is someone that, even in an outside position, never seems to have any distance between

Late in his improbably greenlit study-of-women-via-a-centuries-old-Japanese-art-form, Vollmann writes: \"My voyeurism makes me forget that the world is in fact not a stage\" and, considering the aim of his study, this would a detrimental point of criticism; however, anyone who has read Vollmann\'s work (as they assuredly have if they\'re coming to this pleasantly non-essential addition to his bibliography) know he is someone that, even in an outside position, never seems to have any distance between himself and his subjects.
Kissing the Mask is classic Vollmann:his frighteningly extensive depth of literary knowledge combined with his love of prostitutes (and their culture) is allowed to run rampant in his take on centuries old aspects of Japanese culture; which is the true aim of this book.
Consistently, but not constantly, reminding the reader of his position as an \"ape in a cage\" when it comes to Noh theater (even if he seems to effortlessly discuss handfuls of plays with the simplicity of a subject-master), Vollmann may be more interested in women as a subject (or just in general) than the aspects of ancient Japanese culture that act as his lens, but his true curiosities lie in Noh theater and Geisha culture; the \"beauty, understatement and feminity\" of the book\'s subtitle is merely a place to hinge his thoughts and, let\'s be honest, keep his page count to a trim (for Vollmann standards) 400 pages.
And why not? Noh theater is such a strange and fascinating-on-the-page that it seems both both hard to ignore as a man of letters and yet impossible to take on directly (even by those masters that Vollmann somehow charms to candidness throughout the book): where else does an art form slow down over time? In an era where movies, songs, books and seemingly ever other art form is shrinking to fit shortened attention spans, it is so strange to hear of anything that has become longer, slower, and somehow more arcane over time.
Where else is falling asleep during a performance an accepted norm? Per Vollmann\'s description, Japanese salary men move in strange synchronicity to pay to watch heavily make-up\'d women sing, pay more to have themselves made-up and hidden away to watch themselves gender-transformed, and then catch their Z\'s while masked men sing in baritones to represent young girls.
The subject is fascinating as long as you don\'t actually have to sit through a Noh play and in Vollmann\'s hands its damned enjoyable too; just don\'t expect to fully understand his extensive, extended metaphors and allusions nor his desire to kiss a centuries-old wooden mask of a young girl as an old Noh actor\'s adam\'s apple bobs in song beneath.

I have a problem with authors of huge books - books which are not only too fat, but which also have been crammed full with odds and ends. Before sitting at their keyboard, such writers should get rid of their superfluous energy by an hour of jogging or so. Vollmann calls this 500 page book "small..."

But first the positive side: Vollmann modestly confesses that he doesn't know anything about No or Japanese culture, but his descriptions of No are some of the best and most riveting I have ever rea

I have a problem with authors of huge books - books which are not only too fat, but which also have been crammed full with odds and ends. Before sitting at their keyboard, such writers should get rid of their superfluous energy by an hour of jogging or so. Vollmann calls this 500 page book \"small...\"

But first the positive side: Vollmann modestly confesses that he doesn\'t know anything about No or Japanese culture, but his descriptions of No are some of the best and most riveting I have ever read (during a stay in Japan, he sees a great variety of No plays, has interviews with important actors and also meets a mask maker). He just describes what he sees, but he is a good observer who knows how to translate those observations into inspiring prose.

Then the negative side: in the No female characters are played by (often elderly) men with masks - those masks are perhaps the central aspect of No. Different from Kabuki, where the onnagata (male players of female roles) will move and talk in a feminine way, in No the players of feminine roles will speak, sing and move like the elderly men they are - the fiction of femininity is wholly in the mask (and the fantasy of the viewer).

This leads Vollmann to the teasing question to what extent femininity in general is a performance and the even more fundamental question: what is a woman? - a problem which takes Vollmann not only to transvestite bars in Tokyo and geisha in Kyoto, but also has him discuss Kabuki\'s onnagata, Greek cult statues, Norse sagas, transgender women, porn queens, Valkyries and Venus figurines. In other words, he jumps from one thing to another without any clear thread and fills the big book with only loosely related snippets and anecdotes. It is all too much like late night bar talk – I wish Vollmann would have concentrated more on the No theater (about which there is still a lot to say).

So if Vollmann\'s descriptions of the No theater inspire you, quickly find a book with translations of No plays to enjoy the real thing (see ).

P.S. This hardcover book was published on such sub-standard paper that already within 10 years it is discoloring...

(See my website: )

I have a problem with authors of huge books - books which are not only too fat, but which also have been crammed full with odds and ends. Before sitting at their keyboard, such writers should get rid of their superfluous energy by an hour of jogging or so. Vollmann calls this 500 page book "small..."

But first the positive side: Vollmann modestly confesses that he doesn't know anything about No or Japanese culture, but his descriptions of No are some of the best and most riveting I have ever rea

I have a problem with authors of huge books - books which are not only too fat, but which also have been crammed full with odds and ends. Before sitting at their keyboard, such writers should get rid of their superfluous energy by an hour of jogging or so. Vollmann calls this 500 page book \"small...\"

But first the positive side: Vollmann modestly confesses that he doesn\'t know anything about No or Japanese culture, but his descriptions of No are some of the best and most riveting I have ever read (during a stay in Japan, he sees a great variety of No plays, has interviews with important actors and also meets a mask maker). He just describes what he sees, but he is a good observer who knows how to translate those observations into inspiring prose.

Then the negative side: in the No female characters are played by (often elderly) men with masks - those masks are perhaps the central aspect of No. Different from Kabuki, where the onnagata (male players of female roles) will move and talk in a feminine way, in No the players of feminine roles will speak, sing and move like the elderly men they are - the fiction of femininity is wholly in the mask (and the fantasy of the viewer).

This leads Vollmann to the teasing question to what extent femininity in general is a performance and the even more fundamental question: what is a woman? - a problem which takes Vollmann not only to transvestite bars in Tokyo and geisha in Kyoto, but also has him discuss Kabuki\'s onnagata, Greek cult statues, Norse sagas, transgender women, porn queens, Valkyries and Venus figurines. In other words, he jumps from one thing to another without any clear thread and fills the big book with only loosely related snippets and anecdotes. It is all too much like late night bar talk – I wish Vollmann would have concentrated more on the No theater (about which there is still a lot to say).

So if Vollmann\'s descriptions of the No theater inspire you, quickly find a book with translations of No plays to enjoy the real thing (see ).

P.S. This hardcover book was published on such sub-standard paper that already within 10 years it is discoloring...

(See my website: )

An interesting narrative on how femininity is symbolized and codified by culture with a special emphasis on Japan, Noh theater and geisha with side trips into Norse legends. Because the author is an outsider, i.e. a male trying to understand what it means to be female, he circles around the truism that the rules for being female are so stylized that it's hard for a woman to feel comfortable with her femininity, a woman has to study to perform as a female.

An interesting narrative on how femininity is symbolized and codified by culture with a special emphasis on Japan, Noh theater and geisha with side trips into Norse legends. Because the author is an outsider, i.e. a male trying to understand what it means to be female, he circles around the truism that the rules for being female are so stylized that it\'s hard for a woman to feel comfortable with her femininity, a woman has to study to perform as a female.

An interesting narrative on how femininity is symbolized and codified by culture with a special emphasis on Japan, Noh theater and geisha with side trips into Norse legends. Because the author is an outsider, i.e. a male trying to understand what it means to be female, he circles around the truism that the rules for being female are so stylized that it's hard for a woman to feel comfortable with her femininity, a woman has to study to perform as a female.

An interesting narrative on how femininity is symbolized and codified by culture with a special emphasis on Japan, Noh theater and geisha with side trips into Norse legends. Because the author is an outsider, i.e. a male trying to understand what it means to be female, he circles around the truism that the rules for being female are so stylized that it\'s hard for a woman to feel comfortable with her femininity, a woman has to study to perform as a female.

Vollmann focusing a whole work on beauty and femininity and of course Noh theater? How could this not be great? Exactly, it is great. He makes jokes about how unlikely it is for him to write about understatement since he is the maximalist's maximalist but my favorite Vollmann book is "The Atlas" and he shows how well he can handle gentle, understated prose (he was inspired there by Kawabata). This book is a great tight concise work of non-fiction treating the subject well.

Vollmann focusing a whole work on beauty and femininity and of course Noh theater? How could this not be great? Exactly, it is great. He makes jokes about how unlikely it is for him to write about understatement since he is the maximalist\'s maximalist but my favorite Vollmann book is \"The Atlas\" and he shows how well he can handle gentle, understated prose (he was inspired there by Kawabata). This book is a great tight concise work of non-fiction treating the subject well.

Vollmann focusing a whole work on beauty and femininity and of course Noh theater? How could this not be great? Exactly, it is great. He makes jokes about how unlikely it is for him to write about understatement since he is the maximalist's maximalist but my favorite Vollmann book is "The Atlas" and he shows how well he can handle gentle, understated prose (he was inspired there by Kawabata). This book is a great tight concise work of non-fiction treating the subject well.

Vollmann focusing a whole work on beauty and femininity and of course Noh theater? How could this not be great? Exactly, it is great. He makes jokes about how unlikely it is for him to write about understatement since he is the maximalist\'s maximalist but my favorite Vollmann book is \"The Atlas\" and he shows how well he can handle gentle, understated prose (he was inspired there by Kawabata). This book is a great tight concise work of non-fiction treating the subject well.

This is unquestionably the greatest exploration of the Japanese ideal of beauty and femininity possible by a white American male. I'm kinda damning with faint praise, but... kinda not. It's written in that Vollman clever and dry way, but it's never really boring.

This is unquestionably the greatest exploration of the Japanese ideal of beauty and femininity possible by a white American male. I\'m kinda damning with faint praise, but... kinda not. It\'s written in that Vollman clever and dry way, but it\'s never really boring.

This is unquestionably the greatest exploration of the Japanese ideal of beauty and femininity possible by a white American male. I'm kinda damning with faint praise, but... kinda not. It's written in that Vollman clever and dry way, but it's never really boring.

This is unquestionably the greatest exploration of the Japanese ideal of beauty and femininity possible by a white American male. I\'m kinda damning with faint praise, but... kinda not. It\'s written in that Vollman clever and dry way, but it\'s never really boring.

An exploration of William Vollmann's vision of Noh and women: a complex follow up to "Whores for Gloria". A difficult but in the end rewarding read.

An exploration of William Vollmann\'s vision of Noh and women: a complex follow up to \"Whores for Gloria\". A difficult but in the end rewarding read.

An exploration of William Vollmann's vision of Noh and women: a complex follow up to "Whores for Gloria". A difficult but in the end rewarding read.

An exploration of William Vollmann\'s vision of Noh and women: a complex follow up to \"Whores for Gloria\". A difficult but in the end rewarding read.

Nuestra reseña por acá

Nuestra reseña por acá

Nuestra reseña por acá

Nuestra reseña por acá

I want to know what Oriana thinks.

I want to know what Oriana thinks.

Have you ever stumbled across a book that's so dense and so good that it intimidates you with its sheer awesomeness? I think I'd need a week of uninterrupted reading just to do this book justice.

Have you ever stumbled across a book that\'s so dense and so good that it intimidates you with its sheer awesomeness? I think I\'d need a week of uninterrupted reading just to do this book justice.

Have you ever stumbled across a book that's so dense and so good that it intimidates you with its sheer awesomeness? I think I'd need a week of uninterrupted reading just to do this book justice.

Have you ever stumbled across a book that\'s so dense and so good that it intimidates you with its sheer awesomeness? I think I\'d need a week of uninterrupted reading just to do this book justice.

Not an easy read but rewarding to get thru this book. I learned about a study in Feminiity in Japenese Noh Theatre. I will read more books from this author.

Not an easy read but rewarding to get thru this book. I learned about a study in Feminiity in Japenese Noh Theatre. I will read more books from this author.

Awkward, and poorly written. Also assumes familiarity with Japanese cultural history.

Awkward, and poorly written. Also assumes familiarity with Japanese cultural history.