Short History of Sociological Thought Book

I learned some things from it. But it was a slow, dense read. Much denser than it should have been for a "short history". The writing could've been better, I feel. The meat was there, but the information struggled to get out. At a fundamental level, editing would have helped; there were commas missing, and inappropriate commas, that made sentences less clear than they could have been. There were sentences that were confusing for other reasons.