|
|
Sold Out
Book Categories |
This book examines decision making by appellate judges from a psychological viewpoint. The process of deciding a case, from the initial decision whether to grant certiorari to the final announcement of a decision, is analyzed using contemporary concepts from the field of psychology, especially social cognition theory. The impact of amicus briefs submitted to the courts by the American Psychological Association is evaluated.
| Price | Condition | Delivery | Seller | Action |
| $134.97 | Digital |
| WonderClub |
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish List
X
This item is in your Collection
Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant?
X
This Item is in Your Inventory
Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant?
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant?, This book examines decision making by appellate judges from a psychological viewpoint. The process of deciding a case, from the initial decision whether to grant certiorari to the final announcement of a decision, is analyzed using contemporary concepts f, Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant? to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant?, This book examines decision making by appellate judges from a psychological viewpoint. The process of deciding a case, from the initial decision whether to grant certiorari to the final announcement of a decision, is analyzed using contemporary concepts f, Judicial Decision Making: Is Psychology Relevant? to your collection on WonderClub |