|
|
Sold Out
Book Categories |
| Foreword | xi | |
| Preface | xiii | |
| Explanation of General Format | xvii | |
| Acknowledgments | xix | |
| A Skeptic's Quest | xxi | |
| Introduction | 1 | |
| Part 1 | The Case for the Bible | |
| 1 | The Uniqueness of the Bible | 19 |
| 2 | How We Got the Bible | 37 |
| 3 | Is the New Testament Historically Reliable? | 59 |
| 4 | Is the Old Testament Historically Reliable? | 103 |
| Part 2 | The Case for Jesus | |
| 5 | Jesus: A Man of History | 169 |
| 6 | Old Testament Prophecies Fulfilled in Jesus Christ | 193 |
| 7 | The Resurrection-Hoax or History? | 245 |
| 8 | If Jesus Wasn't God, He Deserves an Oscar | 351 |
| 9 | The Trilemma-Lord, Liar, or Lunatic? | 375 |
| 10 | The Great Proposition | 387 |
| Part 3 | Cross-Examination & Rebuttals | |
| Section 1 | Biblical Criticism and the Presupposition of Antisupernaturalism | |
| 11 | A Brief Introduction to Biblical Criticism | 441 |
| 12 | The Presupposition of Antisupernaturalism | 447 |
| Section 2 | Attack on the Old Testament-The Documentary Hypothesis | |
| 13 | Overview of the Documentary Hypothesis | 477 |
| 14 | Documentary Presuppositions and Corresponding Rebuttals | 493 |
| Section 3 | Attack on the New Testament-Form Criticism | |
| 15 | Introduction to New Testament Form Criticism | 583 |
| 16 | Historical Skepticism | 597 |
| 17 | Modern Theology and Biblical Criticism | 609 |
| 18 | Jesus under Fire | 617 |
| Bibliography | 631 | |
| Biographical Sketches of Selected Authors | 695 | |
| Author Index | 715 | |
| Subject Index | 729 | |
| Would You Like to Know God Personally? | 739 |
| Price | Condition | Delivery | Seller | Action |
| $99.99 | Digital |
| WonderClub |
Risto Ilkka
reviewed Evidence for Christianity on April 08, 2009
Evidence for Christianity
Horribly researched, use of circular logic, omissions and/or misstatements of fact, etc, etc. Many sources are either not present, not reliable, or biased. Need I go on?
I've written better things when I was a freshman in college. Anyone that calls this "scholarly," "concrete," or anything of the sort is either stupid or biased themselves. It's obvious on the subtitle ("evidences" is not even a word!) and throughout the text that this book didn't go through a rigorous editing process. On page 30, the author references the wrong part of his own book ("part 2" instead of part 3). The Documentary Hypothesis is explained wrong, and key facts of its formulation and history are either missing or misstated (Chapter 13). These example are only a few of the plethora I could cite.
In conclusion, if you value elevated discourse on theology and/or metaphysical studies, do not give this book a second glance. I wouldn't even use it for toilet paper.
Login|Complaints|Blog|Games|Digital Media|Souls|Obituary|Contact Us|FAQ
CAN'T FIND WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING FOR? CLICK HERE!!! X
You must be logged in to add to WishlistX
This item is in your Wish List
X
This item is in your Collection
Evidence for Christianity
X
This Item is in Your Inventory
Evidence for Christianity
X
You must be logged in to review the productsX
X
X
Add Evidence for Christianity, Whether debating Marxists, college professors, or Islamic apologists, Josh McDowell's hallmark has always been to walk boldly into enemy territory and speak truth. This book is based on the expectation that, with a growing number of adults becoming increa, Evidence for Christianity to the inventory that you are selling on WonderClubX
X
Add Evidence for Christianity, Whether debating Marxists, college professors, or Islamic apologists, Josh McDowell's hallmark has always been to walk boldly into enemy territory and speak truth. This book is based on the expectation that, with a growing number of adults becoming increa, Evidence for Christianity to your collection on WonderClub |
