A conscious person's guide to relationships Book

Well, it's definitely not racist, as one reviewer asserted. Give me a break.
It's an interesting review of the evolution of our understanding of human biohistory. It has a certain point of view, which is not hidden. Take it or leave it.
I learned a lot and I enjoy learning things. I wasn't propagandized. I do possess critical judgement.
One way I judge how useful a book was to me is how much highlighting I've done, in how many colors, how many varicolored post-it notes festoon its pages, and my copy of this book looks quite festive. So, yeah, it was useful.
Criticism: Why is Wolpoff constantly called Milford? In the initial stages of reading the book, I kept wondering who the hell was Milford and kept looking up Milford in the index and finding nothing. Don't waste my time like that authors. Not appreciated. I'm busy, read the book as I have a few spare minutes and really may not pay attention to an author's first name, especially if it is a nonstandard one.
Really enjoyed the sketches of Haeckel and Coon (I know, a race theorist named "Coon."--You gotta be kidding me.)
Favorite quote: Hmm... This one was pretty interesting:
"There is a direct link between Haeckel's interpretation of Darwinism and his version of polygenism, and the biopolicy of the Nazi regime. The biopolicy of the National Socialists arguably formed the central theorem of Nazism, underlying the most infamous political ideology and social policies of 20th century Europe. After all, 'National Socialism is nothing but applied biology.' It was 'the only element of the Nazi era which was neither modified nor manipulated in response to strategic or tactical requirements.' There was virtually nothing in the Nazi doctrines that was not put forth by Haeckel and well known and accepted by educated Germans when Hitler was still a house painter."